Archive for the 'Church' Category

Life in Lubbock

After a few hours in Lubbock yesterday, I returned to this quote I’ve been staring at for a couple weeks. It’s from songwriter Butch Hancock:

“Life in Lubbock, Texas, taught me two things: One is that God loves you and you’re going to burn in hell. The other is that sex is the most awful, filthy thing on earth and you should save it for someone you love.”

And that’s not just Lubbock, of course.

We need to be very careful about the messages we’re sending out with our words and our lives.

One other quote for today. These insightful words are from Doug Foster in Seeking a Lasting City: The Church’s Journey in the Story of God (from ACU’s “Heart of the Restoration” series).

“God expects us to be traveling, not sedentary, always journeying and never permitting ourselves the smug sense that we have found our place in the world.

“Simply put, continuing the journey toward the lasting city isn’t easy. As we’ve seen, New Testament Christians relied on elements like Scripture, worship, leadership, holy living, and the Holy Spirit, all working in combination to ensure their faithfulness to God’s purpose for this church. Emphasized in different combinations from congregation to congregation, these elements provided healthy diversity, as well as continuity, for the growing church. Churches must allow themselves the freedom in Christ to combine these elements in ways that make the most sense for their time, place, and circumstance. Such congregations aren’t denying the authority of the first-century church to serve as our model; on the contrary, their approach aligns perfectly with the principles (if not the specific practices) that governed the early church. This kind of diversity ought to provide the opportunity for Christians to experience the richness and legitimacy of diversity in the church, grasping parts of the story we might otherwise ignore.”

- - - -

There are tragic words — and yet, remarkably, words of faith — at lauravanryn.blogspot.com.

Food Women

I went to Paradise yesterday.

And Weatherford. And Bridgeport.

Diane, Chris, and I went to the “visitation” yesterday to be with the family of Raydean Mattis. Mrs. Mattis became a widow in 1965 when her husband was shot down in Vietnam. After this tragic loss, she returned to college, finished her degree, and became a high school teacher. (It’s because of her story — and my friendship with her son — that I was so interested in the book Hero Mama.)

The visitation was at the Cates Street Church of Christ in Bridgeport, where she was a member. As soon as we walked into the fellowship hall, we saw a few women behind a counter — stationed there to make sure that everyone had food. (It was a welcome sight to my son after a quick 2.5 hour trip right after school.)

It made me think that most churches must have food women — the ladies who express their compassion by providing meals at funerals and family visitations. They’re usually behind the scenes. But they use their talents to make life a bit more tolerable during loss.

Food women. The ones who brought the casseroles and banana pudding to the church lunches we had in the church in Neosho growing up. The ones who fed the whole church on Wednesday nights in Wilmington (along with enough fresh vegies brought in by F. W. Mattox from his garden). The ones at Highland who fed our extended family when Megan died.

Today I’ll be making my first trip to the Iowa Park Church of Christ.

Want to guess? Yes, I was invited to lunch. The food ladies will be at work.

Invitation Songs

We were a three-time-a-week family. Sunday mornings, Sunday evenings, Wednesday nights. It didn’t matter if we didn’t want to go, if we didn’t like something that was happening, or if it was the middle of “The Wizard of Oz” and we’d never seen the ending because it always started at 6:00 on Sunday evening and church began at 7:00.

And somewhere in all three of those services, there was an invitation song. Here are the ones I remember at the moment:

“Just As I Am” (of course)
“I Am Resolved”
“Softly and Tenderly”
“What Shall It Be?”
“O Why Not Tonight?”
“Jesus Is Tenderly Calling”
“Why Keep Jesus Waiting?”
“Out of My Bondage”
“Bring Christ Your Broken Life”
“Lord, I’m Coming Home”
“Sinners Jesus Will Receive”

I know I’m forgetting some others. But these are downloaded into my head. And many of their lyrics are powerful.

Just as I am! Thy love unknown
Has broken every barrier down;
Now to be Thine, yea, Thine alone,
O Lamb of God, I come! I come!

Oh, for the wonderful love he has promised,
Promised for you and for me;
Though we have sinned, he has mercy and pardon
Pardon for you and for me.

Which invitation songs have I omitted? Which ones have spoken meaningfully to you?

Adding By Subtracting

Today, we had a leaders’ retreat at Highland to further explore the implications of being a missional outpost. I was there as much as possible, shuffling between three basketball games and the retreat.

Two Highland guys, Mark Love and Chris Flanders, led most of the discussion time. Both have lots of insight and experience.

One thing Mark said really resonated. He said that as a church makes this move, those who are there for “goods and services” are likely to leave. But, he said, that is “addition by subtraction.”

It’s never easy to lose people. And we should never take pride in seeing people leave.

But, honestly, churches must not be held hostage by a few people who don’t like the direction that the leadership has discerned it must follow. Even if they’ve been there a long time. Even if they’re well known and well respected. Even if they give a lot.

Too much is at stake. One of the pastoral blessings a church must learn is the blessing that’s offered — in genuine love — to those who are leaving.

Usually addition comes from addition. Sometimes it comes from subtraction.

Homosexuality

A couple weeks ago I said I’d write more on the issue of homosexuality soon. Since then I keep telling myself that I don’t have the time to write as thoughtfully and carefully as I want to. And I still don’t have the time. But, I’m going to throw out some thoughts anyway.

1. I don’t think very many people choose to be gay. I never chose to be straight. I just was. It just happened. And it’s the same way with those who are attracted to people of the same sex. They didn’t come down to a big decision at, say, age 16. For most of them, it was confusing, upsetting, mysterious. Most tried to pretend they didn’t have that attraction. They tried faking it, ignoring it, hiding it. Some even gave it the best try they could, went to a Christian college, married a good Christian person, and . . . remained attracted to people of the opposite sex.

2. I am pretty skeptical about most big “conversion” stories. Some think that it’s just a matter of repentence or prayer or exorcism or miraculous healing. And certainly our God is a big God and can do anything he wants. But I just haven’t seen many. I’ve known a few with powerful stories of being released partially or even completely from the struggle. But most have prayed, repented, struggled, counseled, hated themselves, and prayed more. No change. Not because they didn’t love God enough, not because they’re hardened sinners, not because they’re part of some movement to undermine family values.

3. Speaking of family values, I don’t buy the rhetoric that homosexuality is primarily responsible for tearing apart American families. That would be divorce. The breaking of promises by men and women in marriages is ripping apart our families. (On rare occasions, these promises are broken because one partner is leaving for someone else of the same sex. But that’s the exception.) The church must take seriously the words of discipleship on covenant keeping in marriage (e.g., Matthew 5:31-32), while showing compassion to those whose lives have been broken.

4. And speaking of compassion, where is it? Where does all this angry, hateful speech come from? When the Soulforce group was on ACU campus, they were amazed — stunned — that they were shown basic Christian compassion. How did we get to a place where that is surprising? Even here, there were flashes of what their lives are like. One ACU grad student had a sticker on to identify himself as one of the hosts. But after he delivered some students to a Sunday evening service, on the way out some students passed him, and thinking the ID meant he was a part of Soulforce said in a threatening tone, “F—ing fag.” All right, then. Have a good church service. Praise your little hearts out before the one who became flesh and dwelt among us, hanging out with the “tax collectors and sinners.”

5. It would help a lot if we could quit treating this like some special sin that deserves our fullest repulsion and rebuke. Sin is sin. When I read Ephesians 4-5, e.g., the sin that I hear spotlighted again and again is “greed.” But we’ve pretty much come to terms with that. A person can build bigger and bigger barns, they can participate fully in good old American consumerism (regardless of the consequences to the world), and we smile and congratulate them, hoping they’ll tithe. It would be so much easier for brothers and sisters struggling with same-sex attraction to face their temptations if they knew they were safe to share their inner lives with others. For a couple years, I led a group of guys in a weekly meeting. I was the only one who doesn’t struggle with it. Some were single; some were married. All were wanting a safe place where they could seek purity. All said that there is no way they could share this struggle before their elders, among their friends, or in their Bible classes without being completely ostracized and cut off. They knew from experience. And yet these were some of the best men I’ve ever met. They didn’t ask to be gay, didn’t want to be gay, had tried everything possible to be released from the temptation. But they all said that the most powerful resource to them was the care and compassion of other men in a group like that. Being with other men in a safe environment, they told me, made them less tempted — not more.

6. But that isn’t to ignore homosexuality as sin. While I think there are some powerful things being written about the hermeneutics involved — challenging things that we must address — I still believe scripture makes it clear that God intends for sexual relationships to be enjoyed between a man and a woman in marriage. (For what seems to me to be a convincing case, see Richard Hays, The Moral Vision of the New Testament; Stanley Grenz, Welcoming But Not Affirming, and William Webb, Slaves, Women, and Homosexuals.) It isn’t a sin to be a homosexual (in orientation — something we don’t choose); but homosexual behavior is wrong. As Hays writes, The biblical witness against homosexual practices is univocal.” One’s stance against homosexual behavior doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with homophobic feelings.

7. The church should not endorse homosexual marriages, but should advocate (out of justice and compassion) for full civil rights for gay couples. Just because we may not endorse another person’s decisions doesn’t mean we don’t advocate for their protection and civil rights. Here people try to make comparisons with the endorsement of all lifestyles — as if our protection of civil rights for gays means that we need to protect the civil rights of pedophiliacs. Fortunately, most lawmakers see through that smoke.

8. Does this endorsement of heterosexual sex in marriage put a special, unfair burden on those who are gay in their orientation? This is from Hays: “Here a nuanced answer must be given. While Paul regarded celibacy as a charisma, he did not therefore suppose that those lacking the charisma were free to indulge their sexual desires outside marriage. Heterosexually oriented persons are also called to abstinence from sex unless they marry (1 Cor. 7:8-9). The only difference — admittedly a salient one — in the case of homosexually oriented persons is that they do not have the option of homosexual ‘marriage.’ So where does that leave them? It leaves them in precisely the same situation as the heterosexual who would like to marry but cannot find an appropriate partner (and there are many such): summoned to a difficult, costly obedience, while ‘groaning’ for the ‘redemption of our bodies’ (Rom. 8:23). Anyone who does not recognize this as a description of authentic Christian existence has never struggled seriously with the imperatives of the gospel, which challenge and frustrate our ‘natural’ impusles in countless ways. Much of the contemporary debate turns on this last point. Many of the advocates of unqualified acceptance of homosexuality seem to be operating with a simplistic anthropology that assumes whatever is must be good: they have a theology of creation but no theology of sin and redemption.”

9. Is there a place for gays and lesbians in church? Absolutely. While we continue to advocate the biblical view of sexuality (abstinence outside of marriage and faithfulness inside of marriage), we recognize that we are a gathering of stumbling, bumbling seekers of Christ.

From Hays: “Can homosexual persons be members of the Christian church? This is rather like asking, ‘Can envious persons be members of the church?’ (cf. Rom. 1:29) or ‘Can alcoholics be members of the church?’ De facto, of course, they are. Unless we think that the church is a community of sinless perfection, we must acknowledge that persons of homosexual orientation are welcome along with other sinners in the company of those who trust in the God who justifies the ungodly (Rom. 4:5). If they are not welcome, I will have to walk out the door along with them, leaving in the sanctuary only those entitled to cast the first stone.”

From Grenz: “Even if we find such liaisons questionable, we might nevertheless assert that the church ought to minister to, and even provide a spiritual home for, homosexual persons. Regardless of the moral status of homosexual behavior, lesbians and gays are people whom God values, for whom Jesus died, and to whom the gospel must come. Further, the church is composed of sinners — redeemed sinners to be sure — but sinners nonetheless. It consists of people who are seeking to do God’s will in the midst of the brokenness of life. The church can only assist people to overcome sin and live in obedience to God if they receive the ministry of, and perhaps even participate in, the believing community. This is as true for gays and lesbians as for anyone else. . . . The church, therefore, ought not only to minister to all but also to welcome all into membership on the same basis. And this basis consists of personal reception of salvation by faith through Jesus Christ together with personal commitment to discipleship. At the same time, participation in the faith community involves a give-and-take. Discipleship demands that each member understand that he or she is accountable to the community in all dimensions of life, including the sexual. As one homosexual believer wrote to Richard Hays, ‘Anyone who joins such a community should know that it is a place of transformation, of discipline, of learning, and not merely a place to be comforted or indulged.’ Because it is a community of discipleship, the church in turn has a responsibility both to nurture and also to admonish and discipline the wayward in its midst, including those who are not living in sexual chastity, whatever the exact nature of the unchaste behavior may be.”

10. To me this isn’t first and foremost an “issue.” I’m writing about people I know and love. I want them to be safe enough to share their inner struggles; I want their wisdom through years of suffering to be shared with the church. I hope their triumphs can be offered as a witness to the power of the Spirit and their failings to be offered as a reminder that there is a serious dimension of “not yet” that the church tends to ignore. I want to be able to have them hear the words “go and sin no more,” and I want to be able to receive from them the same admonition, for my life is so full of shortcomings.

Loving a Flawed Heritage

As we’ve thought about the charges leveled against Churches of Christ by a minister on the Nancy Grace show, we’ve had to face the truth: there is much in our heritage that is honorable (and that makes us want to scream “that’s not fair!”) and much that isn’t. (For example, is it any wonder that some consider us exclusivistic?)

We’re learning how to love a flawed heritage.

We don’t want to love our heritage like a two year old loves his parents: “Mommy and Daddy are perfect.” Nor do we want to respond like some adolescents: “My parents are mindless aliens.” But we want to respond as mature adults, recognizing both the strengths and the flaws of those who came before us.

I like these words from N. T. Wright:

“Paying attention to tradition means listening carefully (humbly but not uncritically) to how the church has read and lived scripture in the past. We must be constantly aware of our responsibility in the Communion of Saints, without giving our honored predecessors the final say or making them an ‘alternative source,’ independent of scripture itself. When they speak with one voice, we should listen very carefully. They may be wrong. They sometimes are. But we ignore them at our peril. . . .

“It is important for Christians today to be aware of the tradition(s) within which they themselves stand. Each tradition has much about it for which its adherents can be thankful. None is complete in itself — including those . . . that pride themselves on being ‘biblical.’ A way of assessing how valuable, and how incomplete, any tradition may be is to discern the extent to which each tradition can find itself at home in both public reading and private study of the scriptures, without resort to selective readings and exegetical trickery. That is precisely where the proper task of historical exegesis (as opposed to the improper one of trying to undermine Christian faith altogether) needs to make itself felt again and again. The challenge of living with tradition is not so much, as in official Roman Catholic understandings, that one should let tradition and scripture flow together straightforwardly into a single stream, but that trradition should be allowed to be itself; that is, the living voice of the very human church as it struggles with scripture, sometimes misunderstanding it and sometimes gloriously getting it right. That is why the challenge comes fresh to each generation. Traditions tell us where we have come from. Scriture itself is a better guide as to where we should now be going.”

(Taken from The Last Word, pp. 117ff.)

Sometimes You Have to Quit Talking About It

Part of the charge the minister made earlier this week on the Nancy Grace show is that the Church of Christ is exclusivistic, thinking that they alone have the truth.

I’m so thankful for so many unity movements — some large and formal, but most small and informal — that are taking place. What’s happening with the Christian Churches isn’t the final thing that needs to happen; but for many it’s a place to begin.

This year there is a focus on this move toward unity at ACU, Pepperdine, Rochester, Lipscomb, and the Tulsa workshop (among other places, I’m sure).

I love what Bob Russell said at the Tulsa workshop: maybe we need to quit talking about those areas where we disagree. We don’t have to agree on everything to be brothers and sisters. “You don’t have to be twins to be siblings.” Bob pointed out that most Christian Churches aren’t going to become a cappella, and most Churches of Christ aren’t going to become instrumental. So why keep talking about it? Does it really matter?

There’s a wonderful lead article about this in the new Christian Chronicle. (Actually, there are several powerful stories in the issue. Thanks, Bobby and others! Don’t miss the insightful conversation with Royce Money.)

But then this sobering reminder that not everyone agrees with this unity movement:

“All the panelists supported stronger ties between the two groups. That concerns Howard Norton, a Bible professor and assistant dean for church relations at Harding University in Searcy, Ark.

“Focusing on unity without substantive discussion of instrumental music represents a doctrinal compromise, said Norton, who was honored the second night of the ACU Lectureship — along with his teammates — for mission work in Brazil in the 1960s and 1970s.

“‘I think there is a very strong movement within our fellowship — the a cappella church of Christ — to completely join up with the Christian Church and say that what they are doing by introducing instrumental music, that there’s nothing wrong with that,’ Norton said.”

I agree with Bob: we’ve talked about it and talked about it and talked about it. Has anyone besides Diane and me ever reached this point about something in marriage? You suddenly realize you’re just never going to agree, you’ve heard all each other has to say on the subject, and it hits you that your love is much larger than this one matter.

Let’s recognize that we’re brothers and sisters in Christ and move forward. We can’t all worship in the same building, anyway!

Wednesday, February 22

The new issue of Wineskins is on unity and has several excellent articles. (Great job, GT.) But please, please don’t miss the article entitled “Circle of Fire: Barton Stone and a Spiritual Model of Unity” by Gary Holloway at wineskins.org. This piece by Gary, a member of the Bible faculty at Lipscomb, confirms again my belief that, under the leadership of Randy Lowry, a lot of growth and renewal is going to come to that campus.

- - - -

Last night I talked briefly about my first place to preach. One year while I was a student at Harding, I drove every Sunday with Stan Granberg and our girlfriends (now our wives) to Allred, Arkansas. One of us would preach in the morning while the other led singing. Then we switched roles in the evening. I haven’t been back to that tiny church in central Arkansas since 1978, but I’ve never forgotten it. What an important role those good folks played on my development as a preacher and, more importantly, as a follower of Jesus.

Covenant Groups

We all know how important small groups are to churches. The larger you get, the smaller you must get.

But here’s my question: what should those groups be doing?

I love the Larry Crabb vision of groups as a place of intergenerational connecting where we engage each other deeply with gospel values. We learn one another’s stories and help each other through prayer, encouragement, mentoring, and guidance.

But these groups CAN be so inwardly focused.

At the conference I was just at, the senior minister said that he upset many in the church by changing the nature of small groups. Formerly, people drove all over the city to be with people they wanted to be with. Now, instead, they are put in small groups with people they live by.

The purpose of these groups is largely evangelistic. You meet with people you live by, and you all invite those who are around you. He said that every Sunday night people all over town see members of his church (10,000 people) walking down the streets to their small groups.

Should small groups grow and divide? Should they stay the same over the long haul to encourage intimacy and shared stories? Should they be primarily about evangelism or Bible study or prayer or ministry?

I know this doesn’t have to be an either/or. But I’d like to hear from others: what’s you’re experience in small groups? What has been valuable? What suggestions do you have for others?

Church-hopping

Thanks, thanks to our gracious hosts, the College Church in Fresno. Lee and Bill, the world’s greatest chefs, you and your gang outdid yourselves! As Leonard Sweet said after Friday evening’s meal, “If steak were a religion, this place would be a cathedral!”

- - - -

It’s not necessarily wrong to switch churches. There are several good reasons someone might decide they need to do so.

But I’m through catering to church-hoppers. These are the religious consumers who hop from place-to-place, seeking the congregation that best serves THEM. Worship like they like it. Change only when they approve. Children’s ministry the way they think it should be done. Ditto with youth ministry. A class or small group where they are the center of attention.

God bless the Church-hoppers, for theirs is the eternal quest of self-fulfillment.

Here’s my growing conviction: let’s live missional lives–lives poured out for the world. Let’s seep and leak into the crevices of society; let’s offer our lives for God’s purposes of mercy and justice; let’s be poured out like wine upon the altar. If people aren’t happy with that, let’s love them and bless them as they leapfrog to another place. But let’s not get off task in order to keep them. It isn’t the way of Christ.

All things in love. But the mission of Christ must guide us.