Losing My Religion for Equality
Here’s a strong piece by Jimmy Carter, explaining why he’s leaving the Southern Baptist Convention:
Women and girls have been discriminated against for too long in a twisted interpretation of the word of God.
I HAVE been a practising Christian all my life and a deacon and Bible teacher for many years. My faith is a source of strength and comfort to me, as religious beliefs are to hundreds of millions of people around the world. So my decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, an unavoidable decision when the convention’s leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be “subservient” to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service.
This view that women are somehow inferior to men is not restricted to one religion or belief. Women are prevented from playing a full and equal role in many faiths. Nor, tragically, does its influence stop at the walls of the church, mosque, synagogue or temple. This discrimination, unjustifiably attributed to a Higher Authority, has provided a reason or excuse for the deprivation of women’s equal rights across the world for centuries.
At its most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.
The impact of these religious beliefs touches every aspect of our lives. They help explain why in many countries boys are educated before girls; why girls are told when and whom they must marry; and why many face enormous and unacceptable risks in pregnancy and childbirth because their basic health needs are not met.
In some Islamic nations, women are restricted in their movements, punished for permitting the exposure of an arm or ankle, deprived of education, prohibited from driving a car or competing with men for a job. If a woman is raped, she is often most severely punished as the guilty party in the crime.
The same discriminatory thinking lies behind the continuing gender gap in pay and why there are still so few women in office in the West. The root of this prejudice lies deep in our histories, but its impact is felt every day. It is not women and girls alone who suffer. It damages all of us. The evidence shows that investing in women and girls delivers major benefits for society. An educated woman has healthier children. She is more likely to send them to school. She earns more and invests what she earns in her family.
It is simply self-defeating for any community to discriminate against half its population. We need to challenge these self-serving and outdated attitudes and practices – as we are seeing in Iran where women are at the forefront of the battle for democracy and freedom.
I understand, however, why many political leaders can be reluctant about stepping into this minefield. Religion, and tradition, are powerful and sensitive areas to challenge. But my fellow Elders and I, who come from many faiths and backgrounds, no longer need to worry about winning votes or avoiding controversy – and we are deeply committed to challenging injustice wherever we see it.
The Elders are an independent group of eminent global leaders, brought together by former South African president Nelson Mandela, who offer their influence and experience to support peace building, help address major causes of human suffering and promote the shared interests of humanity. We have decided to draw particular attention to the responsibility of religious and traditional leaders in ensuring equality and human rights and have recently published a statement that declares: “The justification of discrimination against women and girls on grounds of religion or tradition, as if it were prescribed by a Higher Authority, is unacceptable.”
We are calling on all leaders to challenge and change the harmful teachings and practices, no matter how ingrained, which justify discrimination against women. We ask, in particular, that leaders of all religions have the courage to acknowledge and emphasise the positive messages of dignity and equality that all the world’s major faiths share.
The carefully selected verses found in the Holy Scriptures to justify the superiority of men owe more to time and place – and the determination of male leaders to hold onto their influence – than eternal truths. Similar biblical excerpts could be found to support the approval of slavery and the timid acquiescence to oppressive rulers.
I am also familiar with vivid descriptions in the same Scriptures in which women are revered as pre-eminent leaders. During the years of the early Christian church women served as deacons, priests, bishops, apostles, teachers and prophets. It wasn’t until the fourth century that dominant Christian leaders, all men, twisted and distorted Holy Scriptures to perpetuate their ascendant positions within the religious hierarchy.
The truth is that male religious leaders have had – and still have – an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions – all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views.
(Jimmy Carter was president of the United States from 1977 to 1981.)
Q ,
My point is that I do not consider men any more favored than women. Just having different responsibilities . I do not not consider it as some kind of oppression for men to be designated as the leaders in worship, the church community and at home. I also do not consider what I say as a preferred interpretation. Just the design God has given. It is a design that is good and provides freedom for both men and women.
Ray B., easy for a man to say.
Sorry Q, I didn’t see that you had responded exactly the same way. But still, Ray, easy for a man to say.
I think y’all have lost your minds. And your faith and you are missing the one thing that God gave you to end this discussion, THE BIBLE. He answer all question and all of life’s little problems. The New Testament is where the answers are. Women are NOT equal to men. Men are the head of the household. Just as Christ is over the Church. Read people Read you argue over things you have no control over. Yes you can change the Bible to fit your lives. But you can not change God’s Law’s. Do not add to or take away from the word. Go ahead have mercy on your souls.
Kimbly, I have heard that so many times but this same argument has been used to justify slavery, racial prejudice, spousal abuse. You can take the scripture and twist it to mean so many things. Don’t get me wrong…I love scripture…it is just not that simple.
Julie , Just because some have lived in disobedince to the will of God , does not give us the right to change His word. Sure , some men have abused women but then so have some women abused men.They are wrong. God is right. Kimbly , what you wrote is right. And you did not twist the scripture. I repeat that there is too much of an effort to let contemporary culture dictate the teaching of scripture. We need to bring the 21st century back into the first. Contextualizing the text will distort the meaning of the text. Also , there are women , and many , who do not agree with the current attempts to change the meaning and they do not feel oppressed and shut out from using their talents. They deeply appreciate the God given design and look at His design as the design needed for the church of all ages and all cultures. They consider themselves as free in Christ.
It is interesting that we will fight for the right to be equal are higher but the one who is our example
“Who, being in very nature God,
did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
but made himself nothing,
taking the very nature of a servant,
being made in human likeness.
And being found in appearance as a man,
he humbled himself
and became obedient to death—
even death on a cross!
Therefore God exalted him to the highest place
and gave him the name that is above every name,
that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow,
in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord,
to the glory of God the Father.”
We may be able to read His word but our pride blinds us and we can not see His Word.
Although I admit that it’s easy for me to say that given I’m a man.
Again the clint above is not me.
Mike is there any way you could see who keeps using my name.
There were three “Clint comments.” The first and third were by a friend of mine who used to live in Abilene. Someone added a second comment that made it look like it came from him — and it didn’t. (Keep in mind, I have access to IP addresses.) Please don’t.
Kimbly – I left a brief message to you here: http://preachermike.com/2006/10/31/divorce#comment-80827.