Skip to content

1989 and Churches of Christ

2009 May 14

1989 was an interesting time in Churches of Christ. Three books had just been published that stirred the conversation: Discovering our Roots and Illusions of Innocence by Leonard Allen and Richard Hughes, and The Worldly Church by Leonard, Richard, and Michael Weed. (In 1990 Leonard’s The Cruciform Church would come out; and in 1996 Richard’s Reviving the Ancient Faith: The Story of Churches of Christ in America would be published.)

These books challenged the notions that Churches of Christ represent an untainted, pure form of Christianity. And yet they affirmed the best aspects of our tribal tradition.

Let the truth of these words by Allen and Hughes (Illusions) set in:

“The restoration perspective has worked in American life in two important ways. Some Americans have enshrined first times as an ideal to be approximated and even as a kind of transcendent norm that stands in judgment on the ambiguities of the present age. In this case, the myth of first times has been a beacon summoning Americans to perfection. On the other hand, some Americans have fully identified their religious denomination or even their nation itself with the purity of first times. The illusion thereby fostered in the minds of these Americans is that they are an innocent and fundamentally natural people who, in effect, have stepped outside of history, thereby escaping the powerful influences of history, culture, and tradition. These Americans therefore have often confused the historic particularities of their limited experience with universal norms that should be embraced, they have thought, by all people in all cultures and all times.”

In February, 1989, there was a buzz at the ACU lectureship as people listened to Allen, Hughes, and Weed discuss their book. I taught a three-day class in the University Church auditorium called “Success: The Fatal Attraction.” (I remember this because they were still doing lectureship books. I just pulled it out. My chapter is the one right below one called “I Saw the Towers of Darkness Fall; I Saw the Morning Break” by . . . Landon Saunders.)

In March of 1989 I spoke at the Tulsa workshop on fellowship. It wasn’t my first time to come “out of the closet,” but it was the first time in such a public setting. Shortly after that, an elder in an Arkansas church wrote people in Searcy saying that if I wasn’t let go, they would bring home 24 Harding students from their church. (As if he had that power.)

In May, I did the opening night keynote at Pepperdine, introducing the book of Exodus. I called it “One Thing Worse Than Bondage.” (Want to guess?) Oliver Howard taught a packed house in Smothers Theater on the topic, “Maintaining Unity in the Face of Divisive Controversies.” Another major class, taught by Randy Mayeux was entitled, “A Local Minister Responds to the Warnings of The Worldly Church.”

Then in July, I gave the opening keynote of the first Nashville Jubilee — again on fellowship (and again a topic that I was asked to speak on). That time, some Nashville church — or perhaps it was a few churches — took out an ad in the Nashville paper (I kid you not!) to attack my speech. For reasons I still don’t understand — though I think just because it was such a large gathering of a group that doesn’t normally have “conventions” — there were summaries of that message everywhere from Christianity Today to the New York Times. Again, I kid you not.

What’s significant isn’t anything I said. That’s just the camera angle I had on everything that year. The real discussion, I think, came from those important books. What if our hermeneutical method wasn’t the only possible one? What if God’s family is much larger than those we know? What impulses in our heritage were worth remembering and emulating? What does it mean to follow Christ in this world?

I mentioned these three books. However, the discussion had begun a few years before. The real shot across the bow came from a Nashville preacher. It was entitled I Just Want to Be a Christian. Anyone remember that?

58 Responses leave one →
  1. Joe Baggett permalink
    May 20, 2009

    Troy,
    The great commission does not say to win souls it says to make disciples. We can drag people to the baptistery all day long and never make one single disciple. I believe the focus has shifted from baptism, baptism to actual discipleship. Also the unchurched in America are completely different than they were even 20 years ago. I believe that the events of 1999 were simply the columniation of many people who had been soul searching for many years. I was actually in San Antonio during the late 80′s with Randy Fenter and Max Lucado. I can remember many casual conversations over dinner or coffee where people quietly questioned what they had always believed and been taught. Today the non-traditionalist/progressive part of the churches of Christ continue to be mostly a grass roots thing.

  2. Dean Meadows permalink
    May 21, 2009

    I would just like to ask what does the New Hermaneutic offer, how is it different than the one which is practiced today?

  3. troy permalink
    May 21, 2009

    Joe,

    The example that Jesus set thoughout His life on earth was worthy of following. The grace, mercy, and love that He expressed was unparalleled. The last few days of His life culminated in the most vivid expression of forgiveness all the way to the tomb. Were His life on earth to end in the tomb, I would be inclined to agree with you. However, it did not. Three days later, the stone was rolled away and Jesus walked out of that tomb. VICTORIOUS over death! He won that victory for us. All we have to do to claim that victory is to die to self and be born again of water.

    I believe that the efforts of some to minimize the importance of baptism is a glaring example of capitulation to a culture in which the exceptionalism of Christianity is flat out denied. I also believe that simply making disciples is much easier to do and much harder to quantify than baptizing people in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, for the remission of sins, that they might receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

    I’m not saying that making disciples should not be our purpose. What I am saying is that a critical part of being a disciple is baptism.

  4. Geezer permalink
    May 22, 2009

    In the CofC there are a lot of people – at least a million I suppose. In a group that large I am sure there are some who have some unusual ideas; but I have yet to meet one of them that taught that baptism was not important.

    On the other hand, I am have met many of them that taught that baptism was the most important thing a person could do and must do, in a particular manner, with some particular thoughts in mind, in order to receive God’s grace. Just because some do not believe it is the magic moment does not mean that they teach that baptism should be neglected.

  5. troy permalink
    May 22, 2009

    Regardless of what people teach, the Word of God is clear on baptism. That should be the ultimate authority.

    To deny the power(not magic) of baptism, is not to deny the power of emmersion into water, but to deny the power of the death of Jesus on the cross. Compare Math.26:28 with Acts 2:28 and you’ll find that both are done for the same exact reason: “…for the forgiveness of sins.”

  6. June 6, 2009

    I Just Want To Be A Christian by Rubel Shelly was groundbreaking … and it was faith shaking for this young legalist. I still have it and consider it one of the few books that helped create a new vision of the Kingdom that I had never seen. Glad you mentioned it!

  7. July 20, 2009

    Interesting blog post. What would you say was the most important NLP factor?

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS