<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Do We Have the Gospels?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels</link>
	<description>Sniffing out the work of God in the world...</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger Butner</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71679</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Butner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71679</guid>
		<description>Charles,

I wholeheartedly agree with your last three paragraphs.  I'm not sure what you mean by using "salvation/heaven" together in this way.  I certainly believed we are saved here and now, when we obediently accept Christ as Lord.  As to heaven in the present vs heaven in the future:  Yes, Jesus clearly talks about reward in the "afterlife" we will spend with him forever in paradise.  And yes, he promises his followers, "In this world you will have trouble..."  This is a fallen world, and will remain so until Christ returns in glory.  However, we, as ambassadors of Christ, can live our lives in the Way of the Kingdom of heaven now, bringing life and light and hope into the darkness of this present age.  That was my key point, but I can't speak for others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,</p>
<p>I wholeheartedly agree with your last three paragraphs.  I&#8217;m not sure what you mean by using &#8220;salvation/heaven&#8221; together in this way.  I certainly believed we are saved here and now, when we obediently accept Christ as Lord.  As to heaven in the present vs heaven in the future:  Yes, Jesus clearly talks about reward in the &#8220;afterlife&#8221; we will spend with him forever in paradise.  And yes, he promises his followers, &#8220;In this world you will have trouble&#8230;&#8221;  This is a fallen world, and will remain so until Christ returns in glory.  However, we, as ambassadors of Christ, can live our lives in the Way of the Kingdom of heaven now, bringing life and light and hope into the darkness of this present age.  That was my key point, but I can&#8217;t speak for others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71669</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71669</guid>
		<description>I keep seeing different versions of this idea - that Jesus preached salvation/heaven as a present reality, and not afterlife - in a number of venues.  I think it's ridiculous.  

Yes, there is a sense in which the Kingdom is here now.  But he also preached about rewards.  He taught about resurrection.  He taught about the time of judgment and about going on to eternal life.  

He said that he came to give us life to the full, but he also said that we should rejoice when we suffer in his name.  He said that the world would hate us, and that persecution would come, but that we would receive our reward.  And he contrasted lasting heavenly rewards with temporal earthly rewards.  

Heaven (the after-life version) was a part of Jesus' teaching.  Can't we teach that we have work to do on earth without removing the truth of heaven?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep seeing different versions of this idea - that Jesus preached salvation/heaven as a present reality, and not afterlife - in a number of venues.  I think it&#8217;s ridiculous.  </p>
<p>Yes, there is a sense in which the Kingdom is here now.  But he also preached about rewards.  He taught about resurrection.  He taught about the time of judgment and about going on to eternal life.  </p>
<p>He said that he came to give us life to the full, but he also said that we should rejoice when we suffer in his name.  He said that the world would hate us, and that persecution would come, but that we would receive our reward.  And he contrasted lasting heavenly rewards with temporal earthly rewards.  </p>
<p>Heaven (the after-life version) was a part of Jesus&#8217; teaching.  Can&#8217;t we teach that we have work to do on earth without removing the truth of heaven?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71668</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 03:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71668</guid>
		<description>I think "Why Do We Have Jude" would have been a more betterer obtuse question.

But the really funny part of this entire post is that "Bill" guy [comment #1] has a stock spam reply and an ad for his blog on just about every "Christian" blog AND most of you took it as some esoteric response to this post.

That was worth the surfing :) LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;Why Do We Have Jude&#8221; would have been a more betterer obtuse question.</p>
<p>But the really funny part of this entire post is that &#8220;Bill&#8221; guy [comment #1] has a stock spam reply and an ad for his blog on just about every &#8220;Christian&#8221; blog AND most of you took it as some esoteric response to this post.</p>
<p>That was worth the surfing <img src='http://preachermike.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sacred vapor</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71667</link>
		<dc:creator>sacred vapor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 03:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71667</guid>
		<description>I just listened to a podcast recently and Phylis Tickle mentioned something very interesting about the new testament and the Gospels. She said that if we equate the NT with the OT in terms of genre and sequence, and the OT begins with Torah, continues with history, includes letters from the prophets. Then the parallel in the NT would be:

Gospels = Torah
Acts = History
letters = Prophets

It's rather interesting to equate Torah, the words of God with Torah, the words of Jesus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just listened to a podcast recently and Phylis Tickle mentioned something very interesting about the new testament and the Gospels. She said that if we equate the NT with the OT in terms of genre and sequence, and the OT begins with Torah, continues with history, includes letters from the prophets. Then the parallel in the NT would be:</p>
<p>Gospels = Torah<br />
Acts = History<br />
letters = Prophets</p>
<p>It&#8217;s rather interesting to equate Torah, the words of God with Torah, the words of Jesus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Butner</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71640</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Butner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71640</guid>
		<description>Great quote and thread, Mike!  I haven't commented on your blog for a while - busy with other things.  Following are some thoughts from a book I am currently working on, emphasizing the power of living in the Kingdom of heaven to transform our lives and relationships right here and now.  Sorry to take up so much space on your blog comments, but the quote just spoke so much to me, and the following seemed so relevant:

Over the course of my life as a “faithful Christian,” I have experienced my share of heartache and disappointment.  Well, despite the pain and failings I have faced in my life since I was a boy, I still believe in the story of a God who is a loving Father, a life-saving Son, and a guiding Spirit.  The powers of hell and the brokenness of this fallen world have not driven from my heart the hope of salvation from the eternal punishment I deserve for my many sins.  I simply do not have what it takes to redeem myself from the natural consequences of my unloving, prideful, and fearful choices in life.  And I thank my Father with all my being for sending his Son to pay the price for me.  But I no longer think this is a story whose primary aim is to give me comfort in facing death.  Does my hope in Christ give me hope for eternal life after death?  Absolutely!  Is that all the hope I have in Christ – a Get Out Of Hell, Free Card?  Absolutely not!!!  

You see, Jesus was not blinded by the illusion that this world is separate from the eternal, spiritual world.  He came to remove the veil from our eyes, so we might see the Truth – that we are already living and breathing in the eternal, spiritual world.  “But whenever anyone turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away.  Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.  And we, who with unveiled faces all reflect the Lord’s glory, are being transformed into his likeness with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.” (2 Corinthians 3:16-18)  He came to show us how to Live, beginning right now!  In his own words, “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.” (John 10:10)  Yes, I am deeply thankful for the boyhood stories I heard from preachers, sang in church hymns, and saw on flannelgraph boards*.  But those aren’t the reasons I believe in the Story of Life today.

	I believe in the Biblical stories of the Real World today, not because of their flannelgraph imprint on my young, impressionable mind, but because I have seen enough evidence of Real World stories in the “real world” to convince me of their life changing power.  I have seen lives transformed, relationships mended, and bodies healed.  I have experienced the unmistakable love of God in the unlikeliest of places.  And so I believe.  And as my belief grows and blossoms into faith, faith leads to changes in my ways of thinking and acting.  And as these changes take hold in my life and relationships, hope draws deeper, fresher breath in me.  And living in the Kingdom of heaven is no longer some future promised land waiting for me beyond death’s door.  I now delight in moments of heaven in the relationships of today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great quote and thread, Mike!  I haven&#8217;t commented on your blog for a while - busy with other things.  Following are some thoughts from a book I am currently working on, emphasizing the power of living in the Kingdom of heaven to transform our lives and relationships right here and now.  Sorry to take up so much space on your blog comments, but the quote just spoke so much to me, and the following seemed so relevant:</p>
<p>Over the course of my life as a “faithful Christian,” I have experienced my share of heartache and disappointment.  Well, despite the pain and failings I have faced in my life since I was a boy, I still believe in the story of a God who is a loving Father, a life-saving Son, and a guiding Spirit.  The powers of hell and the brokenness of this fallen world have not driven from my heart the hope of salvation from the eternal punishment I deserve for my many sins.  I simply do not have what it takes to redeem myself from the natural consequences of my unloving, prideful, and fearful choices in life.  And I thank my Father with all my being for sending his Son to pay the price for me.  But I no longer think this is a story whose primary aim is to give me comfort in facing death.  Does my hope in Christ give me hope for eternal life after death?  Absolutely!  Is that all the hope I have in Christ – a Get Out Of Hell, Free Card?  Absolutely not!!!  </p>
<p>You see, Jesus was not blinded by the illusion that this world is separate from the eternal, spiritual world.  He came to remove the veil from our eyes, so we might see the Truth – that we are already living and breathing in the eternal, spiritual world.  “But whenever anyone turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away.  Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.  And we, who with unveiled faces all reflect the Lord’s glory, are being transformed into his likeness with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.” (2 Corinthians 3:16-18)  He came to show us how to Live, beginning right now!  In his own words, “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.” (John 10:10)  Yes, I am deeply thankful for the boyhood stories I heard from preachers, sang in church hymns, and saw on flannelgraph boards*.  But those aren’t the reasons I believe in the Story of Life today.</p>
<p>	I believe in the Biblical stories of the Real World today, not because of their flannelgraph imprint on my young, impressionable mind, but because I have seen enough evidence of Real World stories in the “real world” to convince me of their life changing power.  I have seen lives transformed, relationships mended, and bodies healed.  I have experienced the unmistakable love of God in the unlikeliest of places.  And so I believe.  And as my belief grows and blossoms into faith, faith leads to changes in my ways of thinking and acting.  And as these changes take hold in my life and relationships, hope draws deeper, fresher breath in me.  And living in the Kingdom of heaven is no longer some future promised land waiting for me beyond death’s door.  I now delight in moments of heaven in the relationships of today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mann.beverly</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71639</link>
		<dc:creator>mann.beverly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71639</guid>
		<description>can it be as simple as teachings to teach us how to love each other as a church and to those who don't know Him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can it be as simple as teachings to teach us how to love each other as a church and to those who don&#8217;t know Him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Cummings</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71634</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Cummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71634</guid>
		<description>"[Based on Christ nailing the old law to the cross as Paul states in Colossians.]"

I feel the artificial separation of the Hebrew Scriptures and even the Gospels from the rest of the New Testament is a big mistake with huge theological implications.  While a new covenant was established, God did not change.  The part of the "Old Testament" that covers The Law (or the covenant God made with Moses) is a minority of the OT.  What about the rest?

The New Testament never discards the OT.  When Paul mentions the usefulness of "scripture" in 2 Tim 3.16 he is referring to the OT (the NT was just beginning to be written).  The Gospels and the Epistles are full of OT references.  Colossians 2.14 does not say "The Law" was nailed to the cross.  In fact, the Greek word for "law" (nomos) doesn't occur once in Colossians.  The NIV translates Col. 2.14 as "written code" and the NRSV simply says "the record."  I believe Col. 2 is talking about Christ taking away our debt and Paul uses this idea of a legal obligation (i.e. a mortgage) that Christ cancels for us with his death and resurrection.

Just my 2 cents...and I have a lot to learn I'm sure.
-Keith

For more discussion on Marcionism &#38; Churches of Christ see Bobby Valentine's Blog:
http://stoned-campbelldisciple.blogspot.com/search?q=Marcionism+%26+Churches+of+Christ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[Based on Christ nailing the old law to the cross as Paul states in Colossians.]&#8221;</p>
<p>I feel the artificial separation of the Hebrew Scriptures and even the Gospels from the rest of the New Testament is a big mistake with huge theological implications.  While a new covenant was established, God did not change.  The part of the &#8220;Old Testament&#8221; that covers The Law (or the covenant God made with Moses) is a minority of the OT.  What about the rest?</p>
<p>The New Testament never discards the OT.  When Paul mentions the usefulness of &#8220;scripture&#8221; in 2 Tim 3.16 he is referring to the OT (the NT was just beginning to be written).  The Gospels and the Epistles are full of OT references.  Colossians 2.14 does not say &#8220;The Law&#8221; was nailed to the cross.  In fact, the Greek word for &#8220;law&#8221; (nomos) doesn&#8217;t occur once in Colossians.  The NIV translates Col. 2.14 as &#8220;written code&#8221; and the NRSV simply says &#8220;the record.&#8221;  I believe Col. 2 is talking about Christ taking away our debt and Paul uses this idea of a legal obligation (i.e. a mortgage) that Christ cancels for us with his death and resurrection.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents&#8230;and I have a lot to learn I&#8217;m sure.<br />
-Keith</p>
<p>For more discussion on Marcionism &amp; Churches of Christ see Bobby Valentine&#8217;s Blog:<br />
<a href="http://stoned-campbelldisciple.blogspot.com/search?q=Marcionism+%26+Churches+of+Christ" rel="nofollow">http://stoned-campbelldisciple.blogspot.com/search?q=Marcionism+%26+Churches+of+Christ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71632</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71632</guid>
		<description>About the sabbatical -

Yes, it accomplished (most of) what I had hoped for.  I didn't work on reading and sermons.  I worked on me.  Through friendship, mentoring, therapy, and prayer.  I enjoyed my family.  I worked out.  I sought restoration, reflection, rest, repentance, and renewal.

I wish everyone had the opportunity.  Others deserve it much more than I did.  It was just a gift.  I received it as such and cherish it as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the sabbatical -</p>
<p>Yes, it accomplished (most of) what I had hoped for.  I didn&#8217;t work on reading and sermons.  I worked on me.  Through friendship, mentoring, therapy, and prayer.  I enjoyed my family.  I worked out.  I sought restoration, reflection, rest, repentance, and renewal.</p>
<p>I wish everyone had the opportunity.  Others deserve it much more than I did.  It was just a gift.  I received it as such and cherish it as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Wishard</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71629</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Wishard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71629</guid>
		<description>What reading Jesus has done for me.
I see His love of nature and life on this beautiful planet.  Birds.  Lilies.  Farm scenes.  Fishing.  He is present in the now.

I see His love for the down and out.  He was asked to help the blind and lame and those with blood diseases.  He was the great physician. 

I see Him as a friend of sinners.  Others couldn’t understand why he would hang out with them.  He made it clear that it was the sick who wanted a doctor.  So He would explain to the self-righteous that the basis for superior service is an attitude of gratitude.

I see Him as bold with the thought patrol cops.  He was creative and new in His style of teaching as well as the content.  The scribes and Pharisees and law experts and elders and such would get in His face.  “Who do you think you are?”
He didn’t back up an inch.  We must learn that compared to pleasing God, it doesn’t matter what people think of us.  

I see Him in sorrow over a lost world.  He weeps because the religious people want to keep their power and position and don’t seem to care.  He weeps because the political power oppress the poor people.  He weeps because there are destroying themselves in their sinfulness and will not come to God for life.

I see Him laughing at the future.  God has a great plan for the future and the kingdom of heaven is going to rule in the hearts of men.  If ever there was a realistic optimist it was Jesus.

This is why I think God gave us the gospels.
Larry Wishard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What reading Jesus has done for me.<br />
I see His love of nature and life on this beautiful planet.  Birds.  Lilies.  Farm scenes.  Fishing.  He is present in the now.</p>
<p>I see His love for the down and out.  He was asked to help the blind and lame and those with blood diseases.  He was the great physician. </p>
<p>I see Him as a friend of sinners.  Others couldn’t understand why he would hang out with them.  He made it clear that it was the sick who wanted a doctor.  So He would explain to the self-righteous that the basis for superior service is an attitude of gratitude.</p>
<p>I see Him as bold with the thought patrol cops.  He was creative and new in His style of teaching as well as the content.  The scribes and Pharisees and law experts and elders and such would get in His face.  “Who do you think you are?”<br />
He didn’t back up an inch.  We must learn that compared to pleasing God, it doesn’t matter what people think of us.  </p>
<p>I see Him in sorrow over a lost world.  He weeps because the religious people want to keep their power and position and don’t seem to care.  He weeps because the political power oppress the poor people.  He weeps because there are destroying themselves in their sinfulness and will not come to God for life.</p>
<p>I see Him laughing at the future.  God has a great plan for the future and the kingdom of heaven is going to rule in the hearts of men.  If ever there was a realistic optimist it was Jesus.</p>
<p>This is why I think God gave us the gospels.<br />
Larry Wishard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71627</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71627</guid>
		<description>I'm actually impressed that Mike was offered a sabbatical, took it, and came back...

I get offered a lot of sabbaticals, and they usually conclude the offer by saying "and don't come back"...    ; - )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually impressed that Mike was offered a sabbatical, took it, and came back&#8230;</p>
<p>I get offered a lot of sabbaticals, and they usually conclude the offer by saying &#8220;and don&#8217;t come back&#8221;&#8230;    ; - )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71626</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71626</guid>
		<description>Jim Woodroof's comment originated with a New Zealand Christian who came to him saying, "I can't do it."  Later, she read through the gospels and came back bubbling, "I found it!"  Claire told him she found the power in the gospels to live the letters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Woodroof&#8217;s comment originated with a New Zealand Christian who came to him saying, &#8220;I can&#8217;t do it.&#8221;  Later, she read through the gospels and came back bubbling, &#8220;I found it!&#8221;  Claire told him she found the power in the gospels to live the letters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71625</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71625</guid>
		<description>Mike,

I find it interesting that you have made no comments on returning from sabbatical.  My experience with sabbaticals is that:
1.  The person acutally wanted to quit.
2.  He/She was talked out of it and offered a sabbatical.
3.  He/She takes the sabbatical, comes back, but still   really wants to quit.

In fact I think the greek word for sebbatical is I want to do something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>I find it interesting that you have made no comments on returning from sabbatical.  My experience with sabbaticals is that:<br />
1.  The person acutally wanted to quit.<br />
2.  He/She was talked out of it and offered a sabbatical.<br />
3.  He/She takes the sabbatical, comes back, but still   really wants to quit.</p>
<p>In fact I think the greek word for sebbatical is I want to do something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qb</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71624</link>
		<dc:creator>qb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71624</guid>
		<description>BTW, one good example of a modern-day heretic of that kind is Philip Kenneson, who co-wrote _Selling Out the Church:  The Dangers of Church Marketing_.  What a powerful bit of prophetic writing *that* is in a marketing-saturated, commercialized, big-box church culture.

qb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, one good example of a modern-day heretic of that kind is Philip Kenneson, who co-wrote _Selling Out the Church:  The Dangers of Church Marketing_.  What a powerful bit of prophetic writing *that* is in a marketing-saturated, commercialized, big-box church culture.</p>
<p>qb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qb</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71623</link>
		<dc:creator>qb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71623</guid>
		<description>Leland, the book refers to church fathers (e. g., Polycarp, Tertullian).  Bercot's thesis, if I recall correctly, is that these men would be considered heretics if their views of Christ, the apostles, and the church were contrasted with the dominant views of the compromised, co-opted, institutional church from Constantine until now.  Basically a good-hearted polemic against the church's tendency to seek cultural and political accommodation, urging the church instead to stand resolutely against the cultural and political winds.  

I can't recall if Bercot goes after the Sadducees and the Herodians or not, but Eugene Peterson (see his _The Jesus Way_) might suggest that he extend his analysis back to them instead of stopping with Constantine.

To Bercot, if you question the "church growth" movement and its assumptions, you qualify as a heretic these days.  (qb thinks it would be a badge of honor.)

qb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leland, the book refers to church fathers (e. g., Polycarp, Tertullian).  Bercot&#8217;s thesis, if I recall correctly, is that these men would be considered heretics if their views of Christ, the apostles, and the church were contrasted with the dominant views of the compromised, co-opted, institutional church from Constantine until now.  Basically a good-hearted polemic against the church&#8217;s tendency to seek cultural and political accommodation, urging the church instead to stand resolutely against the cultural and political winds.  </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t recall if Bercot goes after the Sadducees and the Herodians or not, but Eugene Peterson (see his _The Jesus Way_) might suggest that he extend his analysis back to them instead of stopping with Constantine.</p>
<p>To Bercot, if you question the &#8220;church growth&#8221; movement and its assumptions, you qualify as a heretic these days.  (qb thinks it would be a badge of honor.)</p>
<p>qb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leland</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71621</link>
		<dc:creator>Leland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2008/03/22/why-do-we-have-the-gospels#comment-71621</guid>
		<description>David,

"I once saw a Bible (put out by one of our brethren, BTW) that re-arranges the division to place the gospels in the Old Testament. The implication (actually, it’s a lot more overt than that) is that the gospels don’t really count…only Acts and Paul’s letters."

I think the gospels count as well as the book of Amos. I think Isiah counts for me as well. 

That is just me though David. I really don't see why one differentiates between old and new. They both have their ambiguities and hard questions left unanswered. 

Maybe life asks us what we will do and Amos, Isaiah and Jesus respond in kind with their words and lives. Jesus most important with his life. I do not need a resurrection to give me hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>&#8220;I once saw a Bible (put out by one of our brethren, BTW) that re-arranges the division to place the gospels in the Old Testament. The implication (actually, it’s a lot more overt than that) is that the gospels don’t really count…only Acts and Paul’s letters.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think the gospels count as well as the book of Amos. I think Isiah counts for me as well. </p>
<p>That is just me though David. I really don&#8217;t see why one differentiates between old and new. They both have their ambiguities and hard questions left unanswered. </p>
<p>Maybe life asks us what we will do and Amos, Isaiah and Jesus respond in kind with their words and lives. Jesus most important with his life. I do not need a resurrection to give me hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
