<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huckabee . . . and the Two Doors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee</link>
	<description>Sniffing out the work of God in the world...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SG</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69966</link>
		<dc:creator>SG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 05:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69966</guid>
		<description>I thought I liked Huckabee, and then I read this.
http://scottfreeman.info/2007/12/06/the-whole-truth/
and now it's personal. I could not vote for him even if I wanted to because I would never trust his judgment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I liked Huckabee, and then I read this.<br />
<a href="http://scottfreeman.info/2007/12/06/the-whole-truth/" rel="nofollow">http://scottfreeman.info/2007/12/06/the-whole-truth/</a><br />
and now it&#8217;s personal. I could not vote for him even if I wanted to because I would never trust his judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Dickerson</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69728</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Dickerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69728</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Presidential Candidates I wonder how many are aware that fred Thompsons stated religious affiliation is Churches of Christ?

 As one who is not currently a attending a church of Christ for an Army chapel, I can say I certainly have a great deal of love for these churches. I still regularly pray for Mike and Highland. If I were to move back to Texas I might or might not find myself belonging to one again. It might be difficult after leading worship both a cappella and instrumentally. But i certainly wish the church of most of my life the best, Kent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Presidential Candidates I wonder how many are aware that fred Thompsons stated religious affiliation is Churches of Christ?</p>
<p> As one who is not currently a attending a church of Christ for an Army chapel, I can say I certainly have a great deal of love for these churches. I still regularly pray for Mike and Highland. If I were to move back to Texas I might or might not find myself belonging to one again. It might be difficult after leading worship both a cappella and instrumentally. But i certainly wish the church of most of my life the best, Kent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Knowles</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69686</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Knowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69686</guid>
		<description>Did someone say sherry in the communion? Oh, Sherry and the communion. Sorry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did someone say sherry in the communion? Oh, Sherry and the communion. Sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69674</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69674</guid>
		<description>Mike-  What I'm talking about is pushing an agenda at the expense of unity. Having Sherry Rankin presiding over communion, speaking about walls in the kingdom, and misinterpretting Gal.3:28 is doing just that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike-  What I&#8217;m talking about is pushing an agenda at the expense of unity. Having Sherry Rankin presiding over communion, speaking about walls in the kingdom, and misinterpretting Gal.3:28 is doing just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69667</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69667</guid>
		<description>qb - Nice link.  I'm certainly not saying I'd vote for Huckabee.  For several reasons.  However, I find him refreshing.  As Keillor says, here's someone "who doesn't hate anybody."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>qb - Nice link.  I&#8217;m certainly not saying I&#8217;d vote for Huckabee.  For several reasons.  However, I find him refreshing.  As Keillor says, here&#8217;s someone &#8220;who doesn&#8217;t hate anybody.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69666</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69666</guid>
		<description>Troy - Please tell me you've never been in a church without an agenda.  I hope never to be in one!  The church where I am has a definite agenda -- though I doubt it's the one many suppose.  We are seeking to live out the implications of being gospeled people -- of living in the wake of Jesus' prayer, "your kingdom come, your will be done on earth as it is in heaven."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Troy - Please tell me you&#8217;ve never been in a church without an agenda.  I hope never to be in one!  The church where I am has a definite agenda &#8212; though I doubt it&#8217;s the one many suppose.  We are seeking to live out the implications of being gospeled people &#8212; of living in the wake of Jesus&#8217; prayer, &#8220;your kingdom come, your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69665</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69665</guid>
		<description>Mike- Thanks for the response.  

I don't intend to be confrontational, but I'm not so sure that there is any misunderstanding between us.  I think it is naive, wishful thinking, or possibly even damage control, to think that you've been a blessing to everyone who leaves and that they have remained a faithful and productive member of the body of Christ. If Highland is like other churches that I've experienced with an agenda, there are those who feel abandoned and leave broken hearted never to darken the door of any assembly.  To say that it is not a "cause for deep concern," is amazing to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike- Thanks for the response.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t intend to be confrontational, but I&#8217;m not so sure that there is any misunderstanding between us.  I think it is naive, wishful thinking, or possibly even damage control, to think that you&#8217;ve been a blessing to everyone who leaves and that they have remained a faithful and productive member of the body of Christ. If Highland is like other churches that I&#8217;ve experienced with an agenda, there are those who feel abandoned and leave broken hearted never to darken the door of any assembly.  To say that it is not a &#8220;cause for deep concern,&#8221; is amazing to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: December Straw Poll Roundup &#187; Mark Elrod&#8217;s Lame-O Weblog</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69658</link>
		<dc:creator>December Straw Poll Roundup &#187; Mark Elrod&#8217;s Lame-O Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 11:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69658</guid>
		<description>[...] on a low budget and actually leads in Iowa among Republicans. Chuck Norris, Ted Nuggent and Mike Cope all like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on a low budget and actually leads in Iowa among Republicans. Chuck Norris, Ted Nuggent and Mike Cope all like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qb</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69656</link>
		<dc:creator>qb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 10:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69656</guid>
		<description>George Will, a perceptive observer of all things conservative, has thundered forth with a devastating critique of Huckabee in his most recent on-line column.  Affability without coherence is not much of a blessing to the electorate, and Will exposes him for it.  See

http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/will120207.php3

qb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Will, a perceptive observer of all things conservative, has thundered forth with a devastating critique of Huckabee in his most recent on-line column.  Affability without coherence is not much of a blessing to the electorate, and Will exposes him for it.  See</p>
<p><a href="http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/will120207.php3" rel="nofollow">http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/will120207.php3</a></p>
<p>qb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Shaw</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69654</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 05:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69654</guid>
		<description>Jim, it's a good question, I guess. I'm just not sure I can answer it. First, because my original comment was meant almost entirely as a witty -- I hoped, and perhaps funny -- retort to the earlier comment by Victor. Second, it wasn't so much a "slam" as an observation from my own experience, having left behind my long-term connection to the religio-conservative political ideologies of recent Republican politics. And third,because I didn't choose those five words myself.

But more than that, I wouldn't really hazard a guess about the "five words" that would/would not get a Democrat nominated because I simply have almost nothing invested in Democrat politics and don't know that context well as my own experience. I still have more than a little difficulty "thinking like" a typical Democrat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, it&#8217;s a good question, I guess. I&#8217;m just not sure I can answer it. First, because my original comment was meant almost entirely as a witty &#8212; I hoped, and perhaps funny &#8212; retort to the earlier comment by Victor. Second, it wasn&#8217;t so much a &#8220;slam&#8221; as an observation from my own experience, having left behind my long-term connection to the religio-conservative political ideologies of recent Republican politics. And third,because I didn&#8217;t choose those five words myself.</p>
<p>But more than that, I wouldn&#8217;t really hazard a guess about the &#8220;five words&#8221; that would/would not get a Democrat nominated because I simply have almost nothing invested in Democrat politics and don&#8217;t know that context well as my own experience. I still have more than a little difficulty &#8220;thinking like&#8221; a typical Democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Perkins</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69653</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 04:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69653</guid>
		<description>In a presidential race where there seems to be a dearth of candidates with integrity, Huckabee is a refreshing phenomenon.  Yes there were issues dealing with a couple of poor choices he's made while governor of Arkansas.  But I would love to see him get the Republican nomination.  If Hillary is indeed the Democratic nominee, the contrasts between the two will be amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a presidential race where there seems to be a dearth of candidates with integrity, Huckabee is a refreshing phenomenon.  Yes there were issues dealing with a couple of poor choices he&#8217;s made while governor of Arkansas.  But I would love to see him get the Republican nomination.  If Hillary is indeed the Democratic nominee, the contrasts between the two will be amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69645</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69645</guid>
		<description>Where I serve as a Preacher, we lost some because we have gone too far and we have lost some because we have not gone far enough.  This is an interesting paradox.  In my observation, both sides have one thing in common: a NARCISSISTIC approach to Christianity.  I think this problem is really just a phenomenon that is taking place within the larger American culture.  That is, everything is about me, myself, and I.  And church...yes that too is about me and when it stopps suiting me, either due to too much progression or lack of, then I will find the place that does suit me.  Is it any wonder why Christianity/church is fading in North America?

Rex
Ithaca Church of Christ
Ithaca, NY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where I serve as a Preacher, we lost some because we have gone too far and we have lost some because we have not gone far enough.  This is an interesting paradox.  In my observation, both sides have one thing in common: a NARCISSISTIC approach to Christianity.  I think this problem is really just a phenomenon that is taking place within the larger American culture.  That is, everything is about me, myself, and I.  And church&#8230;yes that too is about me and when it stopps suiting me, either due to too much progression or lack of, then I will find the place that does suit me.  Is it any wonder why Christianity/church is fading in North America?</p>
<p>Rex<br />
Ithaca Church of Christ<br />
Ithaca, NY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69644</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69644</guid>
		<description>Jimmy, you said the five words that might help Huckabee get the nomination in "today's" Republican Party were "Ouachita Baptist University, Arkadelphia Arkansas."  You seem to be making a slam against the Republicans based upon this, so I am just curious: what five words would you string together that might help someone get the nomination in today's Democratic Party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy, you said the five words that might help Huckabee get the nomination in &#8220;today&#8217;s&#8221; Republican Party were &#8220;Ouachita Baptist University, Arkadelphia Arkansas.&#8221;  You seem to be making a slam against the Republicans based upon this, so I am just curious: what five words would you string together that might help someone get the nomination in today&#8217;s Democratic Party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juditko</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69643</link>
		<dc:creator>juditko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69643</guid>
		<description>Is this why Richland Hills went to a Saturday night service?

I've been in several churches as I've moved throughout my lifetime, and I'm not too ashamed to say I very much gravitate toward more contemporary worship, instrumental or not.  After being in a church that had a very "exciting" praise time, it's hard to revert to more "traditional."  However, I am a member of a community (at Highland) that I love very much...(and most people wouldn't classify Highland as traditional...ha ha!...but based on one of my worship experiences, it actually is.)  

What I am thankful for is that I have gotten to experience different worship forms, and just because I prefer one that to me is more "fun" and "exciting" and that I feel makes me more open to God doesn't mean I can't worship more "traditionally."  However, I know well what Mike is saying here about people transplanting to other churches due primarily to the worship experience.  I have friends at Highland who did just that.  In addition, they are still in community in different ways with their Highland connections.  However, it has been an agonizing decision for them in that it was not their desire to "leave" Highland at all.

I am quite impressed that friends of mine are taking responsibility to say, "I need to evaluate my weekly worship experience and see if it is one that helps me be most open to God."  I don't think we saw this kind of honest evaluation years ago.  People just came out of duty, sat, and disconnected...or went away dissatisfied.  I believe our freedom in Christ allows this kind of honest evaluation.  I know that worship is not supposed to be about us, but in reality it comes from us and therefore is all about us as well as all about God...all about how our hearts open and praise flows.  I think we have to be honest about evaluating the avenues where we are most open to God, and if it is in our control, we face a responsibility to put ourselves there. That may mean going somewhere else or it may mean staying put and using my commute as a worship time. 

Would I love a Saturday night service at Highland like Richland Hills has?  You bet!  Would that be better than two services Sunday morning?  Maybe.  However, in addressing these concerns, we can create an unnecessary burden on leadership and volunteers to create the "experience" every week, and if that "experience" is not "good enough", then what?  I think this (for lack of a better title) "contemporary/modern/exciting/whatever" kind of worship is incredible, but I also believe I'm responsible for worship as I look out the window this morning, too sick to attend services anywhere...

The conclusion?  I don't have one...just mixed thoughts and sorting.  I love "contemporary/modern/exciting/rocking/whatever" worship experiences.  I also love the community I'm currently in, which has a middle of the road worship experience.  Would I like a more "rocking" option?  Sure.  But just because we don't currently have it, ours is not "wrong" and somebody else's is "right."  Do I want my leadership in my church to change our worship or offer alternatives?  Yes, I'm open to that entirely.  Do I come EXPECTING THEM to create the worship in me (by how "good" an experience they "produce"?)  No, my worship is my responsibility.  Are there avenues that make that easier for me to do?  Sure.  Is that a product of my culture?  Probably entirely.  But I'm glad I have many options about being excited about God.  

And, having grown up in various C of C's, I'm really glad to be having this conversation at all...we've come a long way, baby!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this why Richland Hills went to a Saturday night service?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been in several churches as I&#8217;ve moved throughout my lifetime, and I&#8217;m not too ashamed to say I very much gravitate toward more contemporary worship, instrumental or not.  After being in a church that had a very &#8220;exciting&#8221; praise time, it&#8217;s hard to revert to more &#8220;traditional.&#8221;  However, I am a member of a community (at Highland) that I love very much&#8230;(and most people wouldn&#8217;t classify Highland as traditional&#8230;ha ha!&#8230;but based on one of my worship experiences, it actually is.)  </p>
<p>What I am thankful for is that I have gotten to experience different worship forms, and just because I prefer one that to me is more &#8220;fun&#8221; and &#8220;exciting&#8221; and that I feel makes me more open to God doesn&#8217;t mean I can&#8217;t worship more &#8220;traditionally.&#8221;  However, I know well what Mike is saying here about people transplanting to other churches due primarily to the worship experience.  I have friends at Highland who did just that.  In addition, they are still in community in different ways with their Highland connections.  However, it has been an agonizing decision for them in that it was not their desire to &#8220;leave&#8221; Highland at all.</p>
<p>I am quite impressed that friends of mine are taking responsibility to say, &#8220;I need to evaluate my weekly worship experience and see if it is one that helps me be most open to God.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t think we saw this kind of honest evaluation years ago.  People just came out of duty, sat, and disconnected&#8230;or went away dissatisfied.  I believe our freedom in Christ allows this kind of honest evaluation.  I know that worship is not supposed to be about us, but in reality it comes from us and therefore is all about us as well as all about God&#8230;all about how our hearts open and praise flows.  I think we have to be honest about evaluating the avenues where we are most open to God, and if it is in our control, we face a responsibility to put ourselves there. That may mean going somewhere else or it may mean staying put and using my commute as a worship time. </p>
<p>Would I love a Saturday night service at Highland like Richland Hills has?  You bet!  Would that be better than two services Sunday morning?  Maybe.  However, in addressing these concerns, we can create an unnecessary burden on leadership and volunteers to create the &#8220;experience&#8221; every week, and if that &#8220;experience&#8221; is not &#8220;good enough&#8221;, then what?  I think this (for lack of a better title) &#8220;contemporary/modern/exciting/whatever&#8221; kind of worship is incredible, but I also believe I&#8217;m responsible for worship as I look out the window this morning, too sick to attend services anywhere&#8230;</p>
<p>The conclusion?  I don&#8217;t have one&#8230;just mixed thoughts and sorting.  I love &#8220;contemporary/modern/exciting/rocking/whatever&#8221; worship experiences.  I also love the community I&#8217;m currently in, which has a middle of the road worship experience.  Would I like a more &#8220;rocking&#8221; option?  Sure.  But just because we don&#8217;t currently have it, ours is not &#8220;wrong&#8221; and somebody else&#8217;s is &#8220;right.&#8221;  Do I want my leadership in my church to change our worship or offer alternatives?  Yes, I&#8217;m open to that entirely.  Do I come EXPECTING THEM to create the worship in me (by how &#8220;good&#8221; an experience they &#8220;produce&#8221;?)  No, my worship is my responsibility.  Are there avenues that make that easier for me to do?  Sure.  Is that a product of my culture?  Probably entirely.  But I&#8217;m glad I have many options about being excited about God.  </p>
<p>And, having grown up in various C of C&#8217;s, I&#8217;m really glad to be having this conversation at all&#8230;we&#8217;ve come a long way, baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SG</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69632</link>
		<dc:creator>SG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 05:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preachermike.com/2007/11/30/huckabee#comment-69632</guid>
		<description>Go Eagles!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Eagles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.755 seconds -->
