Archive for January, 2007

Nothing Worth Proving Can be Proven

To the computer experts out there: Is Vista as good as “they” (translation: Bill Gates) say? Will it match OS-X?

- - - -

I wasn’t in Fresno long this past weekend. But it was long enough to get a “fix” for my Trader Joe’s addiction. My new stash should last me until Pepperdine lectureship. Why no Trader Joe’s in TX?

- - - -

From Alister McGrath:

It is hardly surprising that many are attracted to simple solutions to complex problems. Yet these rightly cause suspicion. We have become cynical of solutions that are too neat and claim to explain everything. We are as weary as we are wary of too-confident answers to difficult questions. The world we experience is just too messy and fuzzy to fit completely into the orderly systems that some crave and others fear. We have to learn to live in an untidy world in which we are not certain of everything — a world in which there are unanswered questions. Some panic at this thought. How can we live when we cannot be confident of anything? The only certainty of our age seems to be that there is no certainty at all. Yet even this confident assertion contradicts itself — like the statement that Bertrand Russell recalled seeing written on a college blackboard: “All statements written on this blackboard are false.” . . .

We have to learn to live with the fact that we cannot be certain of many of the most important things about life. We can be certaint hat 2 + 2 = 4; but that is hardly going to give us a reason to live and die, or cause our hearts to beat a little faster with excitement. Yet with the greater questions of life, we have to learn to live with a degree of uncertainty. Tennyson captures this dilemma perfectly in his poem “The Ancient Sage” (1885):
For nothing worthy proving can be proven,
nor yet disproven: wherefore thou be wise,
cleave ever to the sunnier side of doubt.

For Tennyson, anything that was worth believing could not be proved with certainty. It involved a leap of faith — a recognition that the clues to the meaning of the universe do not provide an invincible case for a meaningless cosmos or one brought into being by a caring and loving God. Perhaps we can give up and walk away from the big questions that are raised. Yet in the end, this does not really satisfy us. Might not we be missing out on something important — and even exciting?

Leaky Knowledge and Homework

My younger son is in eighth grade. This is about the last year that I can help with math homework.

What happened to all that algebra, geometry, and trigonometry that I studied? Did it leak out? Where does all the leaked-out knowledge of parents go?

Why does so much worthless stuff “stick” (lyrics to “The Beverly Hillbillies” and lines from “City Slickers,” e.g.) while so much important stuff “leaks”?

- - - -

Brilliant ESPN commercials playing off of college rivalries. My favorite, of course, is where the A&M fan is playing charades. He figures out that there are three words. The first word is “hook” and the third word is “horns.” But he goes silent. He’d rather lose than utter the words “Hook ‘em Horns.”

By some accounts, those were the first words I spoke. As a campus baby while my parents were attending UT, I became indoctrinated in “Hook-em-Horns” philosophy. That’s why Vince Young made January, 2006 such a special month!

- - - -

You haven’t shopped online until you’ve shopped at “728b: The Ultimate Church of Christ Shopping Place.” Maybe we could all show up at the afternoon class at Pepperdine in one of those t-shirts!

Can’t Do Megachurch Anymore

Once again I enjoyed so much being with the rest of the Zoe team at the West Coast Conference, hosted by the College Church of Christ in Fresno. Next are the Lubbock (March) and Orlando (June) regional conferences.

Take time to read this excellent piece by Wade Hodges and Greg Taylor about the Garnett Church of Christ in Tulsa. (Great job, guys!) It’s entitled “We Can’t Do Megachurch Anymore.”

Boy Preacher

My senior year at Harding, I was unleashed on two unsuspecting congregations: one in Alread (go to Clinton and then west on hwy 16 through beautiful Ozark hills), and then one in Sheridan.

Here’s what I remember about that year of preaching:

1. I’m glad no one was taping sermons then. I’m especially thankful there are no surviving MP3s for a podcast. (Note to anyone in Alread and Sheridan: if there are any surviving reel-to-reel copies, I’d be willing to buy them in order to destroy them.)

2. I loved the drive time. A beautiful blonde was sitting by my side every mile of the way.

3. Even if I didn’t feed the congregation well, they certainly fed us well! It was a nice break from the regular fare of Pattie Cobb cafeteria on the Harding campus. (Does anyone else remember eating there?) We’re talking home-grown vegies and large quantities of beef.

4. There was great joy in standing before the church speaking about things that matter. My life hadn’t caught up to the things I spoke about — it hasn’t yet! — and yet there was electricity in speaking words of faith and hope.

5. This tiny church (Alread) and small church (Sheridan) launched me with encouragement and compassion. How many churches are there out there — within driving distance of Abilene, Searcy, Oklahoma City, Lubbock, Henderson, Nashville, Malibu, etc.– that have graciously listened to people who knew way more about Greek and Hebrew than they yet knew about life? Blessed are the encouragers of the world.

Is There Any Hope for Western Christianity?

Can the West be re-evangelized? Only if we unlearn our default ethnocentric assumptions about “real” Christianity (our own) and unlearn our blindness to the ways Western Christianity is infected by cultural idolatry. It may be more blessed to give than to receive, but it is often harder to receive than to give. That reverses the polarity of patron and client and makes us uncomfortably aware that what Jesus said to the Laodicean church might apply to us in the West: “You say, ‘I am rich; I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing.’ But you do not realize that you are wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked” (Rev. 3:17).

Want to read more? You can find it here. This excellent piece by Christopher Wright would be an excellent discussion starter for any Bible class, small group, or leaders’ retreat. (Thanks, Jim, for telling me about it!)

Here’s another paragraph to whet your appetite:

So another piece of unlearning we must do is breaking the habit of using the term mission field to refer to everywhere else in the world except our home country in the West. The language of home and mission field is still used by many churches and agencies, but it fundamentally misrepresents reality. Not only does it perpetuate a patronizing view of the rest of the world as always being on the receiving end of our missionary largesse, but it also fails to recognize the maturity of churches in many other lands.

- - - -

And PLEASE, when you get a chance, read this book review of John Stackhouse’s new Finally Feminist: A Pragmatic Christian Understanding of Gender — a review written by Susan Wise Bauer.

Here, again, is just a taste:

Stackhouse finds, in the church’s changing attitude toward slavery, a proper model for the church’s changing attitude toward women. He points out that while women and homosexuals are never linked in the restrictive passages of the New Testament, women and slaves are. Women and slaves in the early church, freed in Christ, were nevertheless encouraged to observe cultural norms to keep the gospel from disrepute.

But slaves have been freed from that particular cultural norm—or such is the overwhelming consensus today. “In the case of slavery,” Stackhouse writes, “Christians worldwide have come to agree that the social conservatism of the New Testament was a temporary matter.” This was not an agreement reached without struggle; Stackhouse points out that theologians of the 19th century “marshalled powerful, Bible-based arguments” on both sides of the issue. “[A] straightforward interpretation of the passages regarding slavery conveys no obvious condemnation of the institution,” he concludes, “and seems instead to encourage Christians in both roles, master and slave, to stay right where they are and simply behave properly. Yet there is no important Christian leader anywhere in the modern world today who defends slavery.”

Stackhouse argues that the abolition of slavery provides us with a model for the Holy Spirit’s slow, ongoing work in doing away with a sinful, oppressive cultural norm—a change that doesn’t at all undercut the authority of Scripture. Many evangelicals point to thousands of years of patriarchy as proof that patriarchy is an essential part of God’s creation. Yet slavery, which we have now rejected, was as universal as patriarchy, and the Christian church has rightfully rejected it.

Well said!

The Difference Between You and God

These Zoe conferences are coming up very soon:

Fresno

Lubbock

My orthopedic surgeon cleared me for this weekend if I’ll use crutches, sit on a stool, and keep my leg elevated. This should be interesting. I think if they have any compassion, Brandon and the whole Zoe team will do likewise just so I don’t feel embarrassed.

- - - -

Words to ponder from Anne Lamott: “The biggest difference between you and God is that God doesn’t think he’s you.”

Or how about this one (that I wrote down, but forgot the source): “People who over-work under-produce.”

The Looming Tower

A few weeks ago when I read the list of the NY Times’s Top 10 books of 2006, one in particular stood out. I’d read Lawrence Wright’s excellent In the New World years ago. So I ordered The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11 and was not disappointed.

I now feel like I have a much better understanding of Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, of the source of their hatred, and of the fertile ground for their recruitment.

This is an exhaustive book. I kept wondering, How many interviews did this Austin writer actually have?

It’s the carefully woven story of why, in 1996 from a cave in Afghanistan (after being shoved out of Sudan), Bin Laden declared war on the United States. He and many Islamic fundamentalists were furious that five years after the invasion of Kuwait, U.S. troops were still stationed in the land of Mohammed, the prophet of Islam. “Saudis were mortified by the need to turn to Christians and Jews to defend the holy land of Islam. That many of these foreign soldiers were women only added to their embarrassment.”

Mohammed bin Laden fathered 54 children by 22 wives. At least, officially. “The total number of wives he procured is impossible to determine, since he would often ‘marry’ in the afternoon and divorce that night. An assistant followed behind to take care of any children he might have left in his wake.”

Osama bin Laden was the seventeenth son of this wealthy, hard-working construction mogul. His mother had been taken to be one of Mohammed bin Laden’s wives when she was fourteen.

Osama was a fan of westerns, especially Bonanza. “Although he was opposed to the playing of musical instruments [I KID YOU NOT], he organized some of his friends into an a cappella singing group.”

“He was rarely angry except when sexual matters came up. When he thought one of his half brothers was flirting with a maid, Osama slapped him. Another time, when he was in a cafe in Beirut, one of his brother’s friends produced a porno magazine. Osama made it clear that neither he nor any of his brothers would ever have anything to do with the boy again. There seems never to have been a moment in his entire life when he gave way to the sins of the flesh, venal or ribald behavior, the temptations of liquor, smoking, or gambling. Food held little interest for him. He loved adventure and poetry and little else but God.”

Throughout, in addition to the story of bin Laden and other extremists, there are the stories of U.S. involvement in Islamic countries: in Afghanistan (where we supported the resistance against the Russians — the same resistance that wound up hosting al-Qaeda), in Kuwait, in Iran, in Iraq, in Israel, in Sudan, in Somalia. While mistakes by the U.S. government are exposed (including grudges between the C.I.A. and the F.B.I. that resulted in the withholding of incredibly important information leading up to 9/11), this is not a revisionist book that seeks to blame Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, or America for all the evil!

Some insightful words just to whet your appetite:

“Radicalism usually prospers in the gap between rising expectations and declining opportunities. This is especially true where the population is young, idle, and bored; where the art is impoverished; where entertainment — movies, theater, music — is policed or absent altogether; and where young men are set apart from the consoling and socializing presence of women.”

“Few countries in the world were so different from each other, and yet so dependent on one another, as America and Saudi Arabia. . . . In 1970 the United States was the tenth greatest importer of Saudi oil; a decade later, it was number one.”

“In 1990 bin Laden warned of the danger that the murderous tyrant in Iraq, Saddam Hussein, posed to Saudi Arabia. . . . Much of the Arab world was elated by Saddam’s anti-Western rhetoric and his threats to ‘burn half of Israel’ with chemical weapons. He was especially popular in Saudi Arabia, which maintained cordial relations with its northern neighbor. Nonetheless, bin Laden continued his lonely campaign against Saddam and his secular Baath Party.”

“For bin Laden, the cave was the last pure place. Only by retreating from society — and from time, history, modernity, corruption, the smothering West — could he presume to speak for the true religion.”

“The radical Islamist movement has never had a clear idea of governing, or even much interest in it, as the Taliban would conclusively demonstrate. Purification was the goal; and whenever purity is paramount, terror is close at hand.”

The section on al-Qaeda training is particularly frightening. Recruits are engrained with the three main goals: (1) establishing the rule of God on Earth; (2) attaining martyrdom in the cause of God; (3) purification of the ranks of Islam from the elements of depravity. They are taught to hate “the enemies of Islam”: (1) heretics; (2) Shiites; (3) America; and (4) Israel. They often gather in the evenings to watch Arnold Schwarzenegger movies (again, I kid you not), looking for tips about violence. “What the recruits tended to have in common — besides their urbanity, their cosmopolitan backgrounds, their education, their facility with languages, and their computer skills — was displacement.”

I highly recommend this book if you, too, are curious about bin Laden, al-Qaeda, and Islam (including the centuries-old conflicts between the Shiites and the Sunnis).

There are so many other parts I haven’t even mentioned. As one blurb on the book cover says, “The portrait of John O-Neill, the driven, demon-ridden F.B.I. agent who worked so frantically to stop Osama bin Laden, only to perish in the attack on the World Trade Center, is worth the price of the book alone.”

Super Bowl

Well, it is indeed the Bears against the Colts in the Super Bowl. I’ve picked the Bears (think: defense), but I’d love to see Peyton win one. If it comes down to quarterbacks alone, then the Colts should win by about 50 points. Peyton vs. Rex Grossman? Please!

But it’s more than that. So I’ll stick with the Bears, including ACU safety Danieal Manning and Midland Lee/UT running back Cedric Benson.

The World We See

Insightful words from the Talmud:

“We do not see the world as it is. We see the world as we are.”

None of us has a perfect, unbiased view of truth and of the world. All we see is filtered through who we are. It’s why two people can look at the same event, the same politician, the same landscape — and see two very different things.

Very often when people complain about their spouses they’re telling us more about themselves than about the spouses. When someone says they’re in an unfriendly church (which seems to be full of people who are enjoying deep friendships), it may tell us more about them than about the church.

Only partly do we see the world as it truly is. Much of what we see is a projection of who we are — with our strengths, our convictions, our fears, our biases.

One of the most fruitful, yet difficult, journeys is the journey inward. You can tell the people who are, with all the honesty they can muster, making the journey. And you can tell the ones who aren’t.

Adam Langford and Moses Kimeze

We were blessed to be close to the group of university students who moved in 1994 to Jinja, Uganda. They planted churches all around the Busoga region of Uganda, learning the language and loving the people. What a blessing to our family to join the team for a month in the summer of 2000!

In the past few years, the team members came back and were replaced by a second generation mission team. You can read about the team here.

One of the team members, Adam Langford, died suddenly and tragically yesterday in a traffic accident in Uganda.

Here are the final things he wrote in his online journal.

We also grieve the loss of their coworker Moses Kimeze, the director of the Source Cafe, a leader in the Jinja Church of Christ, and, as I remember well from our month in Jinja, an incredible man.

May God bring merciful healing to the families and friends who suffer even though they know these men poured out their lives for the mission of Christ in this world.