<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best Sex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex</link>
	<description>Sniffing out the work of God in the world...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15140</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15140</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Joel M.&lt;/b&gt;,

I've heard that criticism from non-Christians - that people like Joe Beam or TheMarriagebed.com are just borrowing from the secular world.  And I agree that if we reduced sex to mechanics (or biology), that would be a stupid and terrible thing (and that really would be borrowing a lot from the secular world).

I would be very surprised if Joe doesn't emphasize in his teaching the stuff Mike posted about.  But the details, hot words, and technique stuff makes for juicier reporting and gets more attention and are more easily and readily discussed.  I assume that the article/videos make it look like it's more about technique than it really is because Eddie Parish's stuff often get's misrepresented in that way, as does TheMarriagebed.com, and both those sources strongly emphasize the relationship over the technique.

I disagree with you that being open in sexual discussion detracts from the power/mystery/holiness of sex.  &lt;i&gt;How&lt;/i&gt; we talk about it and &lt;i&gt;what&lt;/i&gt; we say about it will add or take away from power and holiness of our message.  I think the "don't talk about it" option (or the "minimize talk about it" option) have long been proven through practice to be &lt;i&gt;really bad&lt;/i&gt; and counter-productive options that don't encourage or produce the holiness of sex that you speak of, or Godly sexual relationships.

(sorry about the preacher's italics... I'm just obnoxious that way sometimes. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Joel M.</b>,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that criticism from non-Christians - that people like Joe Beam or TheMarriagebed.com are just borrowing from the secular world.  And I agree that if we reduced sex to mechanics (or biology), that would be a stupid and terrible thing (and that really would be borrowing a lot from the secular world).</p>
<p>I would be very surprised if Joe doesn&#8217;t emphasize in his teaching the stuff Mike posted about.  But the details, hot words, and technique stuff makes for juicier reporting and gets more attention and are more easily and readily discussed.  I assume that the article/videos make it look like it&#8217;s more about technique than it really is because Eddie Parish&#8217;s stuff often get&#8217;s misrepresented in that way, as does TheMarriagebed.com, and both those sources strongly emphasize the relationship over the technique.</p>
<p>I disagree with you that being open in sexual discussion detracts from the power/mystery/holiness of sex.  <i>How</i> we talk about it and <i>what</i> we say about it will add or take away from power and holiness of our message.  I think the &#8220;don&#8217;t talk about it&#8221; option (or the &#8220;minimize talk about it&#8221; option) have long been proven through practice to be <i>really bad</i> and counter-productive options that don&#8217;t encourage or produce the holiness of sex that you speak of, or Godly sexual relationships.</p>
<p>(sorry about the preacher&#8217;s italics&#8230; I&#8217;m just obnoxious that way sometimes. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Maners</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15138</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Maners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 04:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15138</guid>
		<description>Personally, I have mixed feeling about Joe's appearance on the Today show. I understand and applaud his desire to see married couples have fulfilling sex lives. I feel that his message is primarily for married Christians. To non-Christians, I wonder though if his message makes it sound like the church is just parroting the world's message to "just loosen up" about sex. Don't we have anything more significant to add to the conversation other than "Christians can do that stuff too"? 

Also, I wonder how much openness about sex takes away some of it's power. When we reduce sex to mechanics, we demistify it and make it common. It's like taking something holy and making it just ordinary. Maybe I'm the only one who feels this way but I think we've lost something by being so open about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I have mixed feeling about Joe&#8217;s appearance on the Today show. I understand and applaud his desire to see married couples have fulfilling sex lives. I feel that his message is primarily for married Christians. To non-Christians, I wonder though if his message makes it sound like the church is just parroting the world&#8217;s message to &#8220;just loosen up&#8221; about sex. Don&#8217;t we have anything more significant to add to the conversation other than &#8220;Christians can do that stuff too&#8221;? </p>
<p>Also, I wonder how much openness about sex takes away some of it&#8217;s power. When we reduce sex to mechanics, we demistify it and make it common. It&#8217;s like taking something holy and making it just ordinary. Maybe I&#8217;m the only one who feels this way but I think we&#8217;ve lost something by being so open about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EK</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15135</link>
		<dc:creator>EK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15135</guid>
		<description>Preacher Mike-- I love to hear your words and when you step out in front of the fellowship and blog your mind, it is something that needs saying to the body. Why do our kids learn of sex on the playground and not from Mom, Dad, the preacher...?! "Embibe oh lovers" says the Lord as he watches two lovers in embrace... he rejoices over the marital bed! I had a 13 year sexless marriage and four years alone before my current, Godly and fabulous marriage. Sex is so much better when you have love, understanding, trust and when the lips are softened by the knowledge that he is thinking of you as the person you are and the mother you are and the mate you are rather than the flabby-over-40-lady-who-needs-a-haircut-and-burnt-the-dinner. You can feel it in the embrace and the kiss, the life you have experienced together. AND WOWIE is the final embrace all that and a bag of chips! The Bible describes sex as a glimpse of heaven-- and boy do I BELIEVE! Thank you Jesus for your kingdom, for sex, for my husband and for those who are open to learning from Preacher Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preacher Mike&#8211; I love to hear your words and when you step out in front of the fellowship and blog your mind, it is something that needs saying to the body. Why do our kids learn of sex on the playground and not from Mom, Dad, the preacher&#8230;?! &#8220;Embibe oh lovers&#8221; says the Lord as he watches two lovers in embrace&#8230; he rejoices over the marital bed! I had a 13 year sexless marriage and four years alone before my current, Godly and fabulous marriage. Sex is so much better when you have love, understanding, trust and when the lips are softened by the knowledge that he is thinking of you as the person you are and the mother you are and the mate you are rather than the flabby-over-40-lady-who-needs-a-haircut-and-burnt-the-dinner. You can feel it in the embrace and the kiss, the life you have experienced together. AND WOWIE is the final embrace all that and a bag of chips! The Bible describes sex as a glimpse of heaven&#8211; and boy do I BELIEVE! Thank you Jesus for your kingdom, for sex, for my husband and for those who are open to learning from Preacher Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alice</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15097</link>
		<dc:creator>alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15097</guid>
		<description>Whah whah on the shooting blanks.  No more blessings for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whah whah on the shooting blanks.  No more blessings for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gem</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15075</link>
		<dc:creator>Gem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15075</guid>
		<description>When we had Joe come to our church, I felt the seminar was more about the mechanics than the relationship.  About 1/3 or less was his personality profile teaching -- then there were no practical applications, just "buy my book to get the rest" -- or attend another seminar -- type statements.   When &lt;a&gt;Lynn and Jerry Jones&lt;/a&gt; came, I felt their teaching contained much, much more practical teaching and advice, both in and out of the bedroom.  Many of their lectures (3 days worth!) covered relationship dynamics that would benefit anyone, not just married people.  Our marriage was much richer after that weekend, not just our sex life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we had Joe come to our church, I felt the seminar was more about the mechanics than the relationship.  About 1/3 or less was his personality profile teaching &#8212; then there were no practical applications, just &#8220;buy my book to get the rest&#8221; &#8212; or attend another seminar &#8212; type statements.   When <a>Lynn and Jerry Jones</a> came, I felt their teaching contained much, much more practical teaching and advice, both in and out of the bedroom.  Many of their lectures (3 days worth!) covered relationship dynamics that would benefit anyone, not just married people.  Our marriage was much richer after that weekend, not just our sex life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15072</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15072</guid>
		<description>It might surprise some of you to know that there are regular readers of this blog who are in their 60's. I have been happily married for 42 years. As Mike says, "Times are a changing". My husband and I have always tried to be open to change. And yes, we have attended seminars - including Joe Beam's Family Dynamics class. I would agree that openness about sex has its advantages. But, I still don't like to hear comments like "I'm shooting blanks" and "I've been fixed". I just feel that sometimes we can be too open with things that should be shared only with our marital partner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might surprise some of you to know that there are regular readers of this blog who are in their 60&#8217;s. I have been happily married for 42 years. As Mike says, &#8220;Times are a changing&#8221;. My husband and I have always tried to be open to change. And yes, we have attended seminars - including Joe Beam&#8217;s Family Dynamics class. I would agree that openness about sex has its advantages. But, I still don&#8217;t like to hear comments like &#8220;I&#8217;m shooting blanks&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;ve been fixed&#8221;. I just feel that sometimes we can be too open with things that should be shared only with our marital partner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niki Nowell</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15071</link>
		<dc:creator>Niki Nowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 04:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15071</guid>
		<description>I've been having this same discussion for ages and finally started a blog about it.  www.sexloveandmarriage.blogspot.com.  

Mike, I don't think it is smart or helpful to save discussions about sex for married people.  (I'm not saying you said that)  There are so many who found out about sex the hard way through abuse, friends with benefits, or skewed sex ed talks at school.  The churches I grew up in were of absolutely no help to me when I needed my questions answered.  I was left to flounder on a scary path and play a guessing game when it came to what God thought was o.k., or better yet, encouraged sexually.  I know so many couples that struggled through feeling guilty for having sex with their new spouses because it was so engrained in them that sex was dirty or bad and they weren't sure how to get past that barrier. 

I agree with you that it's not about positions, toys, or anything like that.  I'm happy to hear sex gets better the longer you are married.  Woo Hoo!  But right now, I feel I'm in a position to help or hinder some of the girls I mentor by sharing with them messages about sex.  I say girls, but some of them are married now.  I don't understand people getting upset by Joe - how he talks to people in a seminar or book.  My husband and I loved his seminar and found great healing in our sexual relationship through it.  He is not crude, but he is sometimes graphic - he warns you upfront about that.  He's a good man trying to help others see that sex is good - not dirty and God meant it for pleasure as well as procreation.  I'm so grateful that there is a discussion about it at all and I want to be part of it.  I didn't feel I could turn to anyone with sex questions and I don't want to pass on that legacy - so I'm listening and learning and praying about what to pass on to others.  

One more thing, last summer the author of the MSNBC article referenced in your comments section, emailed me to ask some questions related to his article.  He had found me while googling Joe Beam.  We emailed back and forth a few times and I've been waiting for that article to be published.  Mr. Alexander is not a believer.  His job is to report on sexual issues in the world.  He was interested in checking out what evangelicals thought about sex and how we deal with our hypersexualized culture.  We discussed Joe's seminar which he had been to as well.  I'm glad he interviewed Joe.  I hope Mr. Alexander keeps seeking out info about evangelicals.  The lady who was so upset with the article and the stuff surrounding it on the page needs to keep in mind that it was written by a guy who is not a follower of Christ.  His intention wasn't to make fun of believers, he really wanted to know what we thought.  We can't expect the world to look like Christ, but we can expect that sometimes the world does come looking for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been having this same discussion for ages and finally started a blog about it.  <a href="http://www.sexloveandmarriage.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sexloveandmarriage.blogspot.com</a>.  </p>
<p>Mike, I don&#8217;t think it is smart or helpful to save discussions about sex for married people.  (I&#8217;m not saying you said that)  There are so many who found out about sex the hard way through abuse, friends with benefits, or skewed sex ed talks at school.  The churches I grew up in were of absolutely no help to me when I needed my questions answered.  I was left to flounder on a scary path and play a guessing game when it came to what God thought was o.k., or better yet, encouraged sexually.  I know so many couples that struggled through feeling guilty for having sex with their new spouses because it was so engrained in them that sex was dirty or bad and they weren&#8217;t sure how to get past that barrier. </p>
<p>I agree with you that it&#8217;s not about positions, toys, or anything like that.  I&#8217;m happy to hear sex gets better the longer you are married.  Woo Hoo!  But right now, I feel I&#8217;m in a position to help or hinder some of the girls I mentor by sharing with them messages about sex.  I say girls, but some of them are married now.  I don&#8217;t understand people getting upset by Joe - how he talks to people in a seminar or book.  My husband and I loved his seminar and found great healing in our sexual relationship through it.  He is not crude, but he is sometimes graphic - he warns you upfront about that.  He&#8217;s a good man trying to help others see that sex is good - not dirty and God meant it for pleasure as well as procreation.  I&#8217;m so grateful that there is a discussion about it at all and I want to be part of it.  I didn&#8217;t feel I could turn to anyone with sex questions and I don&#8217;t want to pass on that legacy - so I&#8217;m listening and learning and praying about what to pass on to others.  </p>
<p>One more thing, last summer the author of the MSNBC article referenced in your comments section, emailed me to ask some questions related to his article.  He had found me while googling Joe Beam.  We emailed back and forth a few times and I&#8217;ve been waiting for that article to be published.  Mr. Alexander is not a believer.  His job is to report on sexual issues in the world.  He was interested in checking out what evangelicals thought about sex and how we deal with our hypersexualized culture.  We discussed Joe&#8217;s seminar which he had been to as well.  I&#8217;m glad he interviewed Joe.  I hope Mr. Alexander keeps seeking out info about evangelicals.  The lady who was so upset with the article and the stuff surrounding it on the page needs to keep in mind that it was written by a guy who is not a follower of Christ.  His intention wasn&#8217;t to make fun of believers, he really wanted to know what we thought.  We can&#8217;t expect the world to look like Christ, but we can expect that sometimes the world does come looking for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Alkire</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15070</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Alkire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 04:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15070</guid>
		<description>I remember a time when some of my peers and I were really struggling with questions we had about sex. Our Huddle leaders heard some of our questions and decided to address them openly because they wanted us to have real answers from godly people who cared about us. So, several of the girls and I had a special informal chat time with our female Huddle leaders where they openly and honestly answered any questions we had. It was a neat time, and I am thankful for godly women who weren't afraid to tell us the truth when we needed to hear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember a time when some of my peers and I were really struggling with questions we had about sex. Our Huddle leaders heard some of our questions and decided to address them openly because they wanted us to have real answers from godly people who cared about us. So, several of the girls and I had a special informal chat time with our female Huddle leaders where they openly and honestly answered any questions we had. It was a neat time, and I am thankful for godly women who weren&#8217;t afraid to tell us the truth when we needed to hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Perkins</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15069</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15069</guid>
		<description>If only our crazy world would realize that God's way is the real way to intimacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only our crazy world would realize that God&#8217;s way is the real way to intimacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MommyHAM</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15062</link>
		<dc:creator>MommyHAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15062</guid>
		<description>I'm lol at the shooting blanks discussion...I thought my husband was the only one who says that!  But, that's what I get for thinking ;-)

Mike, Amen!  8 years of marriage, 2 kids and lots of extra inches all add up to what the world would think = a chill between our sheets, but that's what the world would get for thinking! ;-)  

Sex gets better, for some physical factors (such as knowing what your spouse likes more), but mostly for the emotional and spiritual factors that only come with time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m lol at the shooting blanks discussion&#8230;I thought my husband was the only one who says that!  But, that&#8217;s what I get for thinking <img src='http://preachermike.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Mike, Amen!  8 years of marriage, 2 kids and lots of extra inches all add up to what the world would think = a chill between our sheets, but that&#8217;s what the world would get for thinking! <img src='http://preachermike.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Sex gets better, for some physical factors (such as knowing what your spouse likes more), but mostly for the emotional and spiritual factors that only come with time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15061</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15061</guid>
		<description>Paul, lol.  Thank you for the clarification!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, lol.  Thank you for the clarification!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15060</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15060</guid>
		<description>lol.  I love shooting blanks!  It rules.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol.  I love shooting blanks!  It rules.  <img src='http://preachermike.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deana Nall</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15059</link>
		<dc:creator>Deana Nall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15059</guid>
		<description>I'm jealous. I dream of my husband shooting blanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m jealous. I dream of my husband shooting blanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Field</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15058</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15058</guid>
		<description>A little bit of what Joe's teaching  
                     
                    +

a backbone of what Mike said here
______________________________

Good sex!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little bit of what Joe&#8217;s teaching  </p>
<p>                    +</p>
<p>a backbone of what Mike said here<br />
______________________________</p>
<p>Good sex!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15057</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/09/17/the-best-sex#comment-15057</guid>
		<description>Deanna,

We don't have to worry about havin' babies anymore.  I've been 'fixed.'  I'm shooting blanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deanna,</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have to worry about havin&#8217; babies anymore.  I&#8217;ve been &#8216;fixed.&#8217;  I&#8217;m shooting blanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.357 seconds -->
