<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Training for Professionalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism</link>
	<description>Sniffing out the work of God in the world...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: On pastoral theology for the missional church in a postmodern world &#171; just an apprentice</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-65262</link>
		<dc:creator>On pastoral theology for the missional church in a postmodern world &#171; just an apprentice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-65262</guid>
		<description>[...] that my vocational path would not follow the traditional professional model of pastoral leadership. This post by Preacher Mike&#8230; echoes many of my own impulses and questions about the professional model of leadership. How [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that my vocational path would not follow the traditional professional model of pastoral leadership. This post by Preacher Mike&#8230; echoes many of my own impulses and questions about the professional model of leadership. How [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Harris</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-41333</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-41333</guid>
		<description>Google is the best search engine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is the best search engine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jr.</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12539</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 02:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12539</guid>
		<description>If anyone's still out there reading this comment string, check out &lt;a href="http://www.christianweek.org/opinions/issues/2005_issues.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; about why the church must learn to die.  He has some excellent points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone&#8217;s still out there reading this comment string, check out <a href="http://www.christianweek.org/opinions/issues/2005_issues.html" rel="nofollow">this article</a> about why the church must learn to die.  He has some excellent points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Alan Turner</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12491</link>
		<dc:creator>John Alan Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12491</guid>
		<description>At the risk of sounding overly contrarian, I think we're making an either/or distinction needlessly here. Actually, I don't think that's what Mike did in his original post, but I think the comments have taken on a forceful tone of disdain for those who are not necessarily gifted in relational ways but in more administrative ways. 

I think the church needs both to really be the organism and organization (and dare I say "institution"?) God intends it to be. 

It may very well be a sign of our need for community that we tend to overemphasize one or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of sounding overly contrarian, I think we&#8217;re making an either/or distinction needlessly here. Actually, I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s what Mike did in his original post, but I think the comments have taken on a forceful tone of disdain for those who are not necessarily gifted in relational ways but in more administrative ways. </p>
<p>I think the church needs both to really be the organism and organization (and dare I say &#8220;institution&#8221;?) God intends it to be. </p>
<p>It may very well be a sign of our need for community that we tend to overemphasize one or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Wishard</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12467</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Wishard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12467</guid>
		<description>Mike,
I agree with your basic premise.  If we follow Jesus through prayer and mediation we will know how to spend our day serving others.  It will require our understanding of our unique gifts an a good understanding of the needs of our community.  The needs here in Denver for the past 29 years have been discipling men to be good husbands and fathers in my own case.  It means being there when they are broken down and hurting.  It means celebrating their victories and entering into their grief.  It means going to the wedding and the retirement party, but it also means sitting up all night when the parents find out their sweet daughter is pregnant.  This is Jesus centered ministry and if it is not being taught and trained in our univerisities then repentance is in order.  It means that we must examine if our own life is aligned with Jesus enough to give the living water to the next generation.  Thanks for the thoughts Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
I agree with your basic premise.  If we follow Jesus through prayer and mediation we will know how to spend our day serving others.  It will require our understanding of our unique gifts an a good understanding of the needs of our community.  The needs here in Denver for the past 29 years have been discipling men to be good husbands and fathers in my own case.  It means being there when they are broken down and hurting.  It means celebrating their victories and entering into their grief.  It means going to the wedding and the retirement party, but it also means sitting up all night when the parents find out their sweet daughter is pregnant.  This is Jesus centered ministry and if it is not being taught and trained in our univerisities then repentance is in order.  It means that we must examine if our own life is aligned with Jesus enough to give the living water to the next generation.  Thanks for the thoughts Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt W.</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12466</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12466</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike,

   Man I cannot tell you how much encouragement I have received from this blog. I guess my biggest problem in doing ministry is that a lot of churches have always told me that being somewhat regal, having this professional look to you, is the key to success. I kind of felt like if that was the case, overiding loving people where they are at and engaging in their culture and needs, then I didn't want to do ministry.
   Listen, I'm heading up the 1838 ministry at ACU next year, cause Mark Lewis asked me to and I'm also starting up this ministry called "Jesus &#38; The Hip-Hop Prophets" on campus. I was wondering if I could email you about some things and maybe get some insight from you concerning some stuff for the upcoming school year. I would really appreciate it.

Peace,

Matt W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike,</p>
<p>   Man I cannot tell you how much encouragement I have received from this blog. I guess my biggest problem in doing ministry is that a lot of churches have always told me that being somewhat regal, having this professional look to you, is the key to success. I kind of felt like if that was the case, overiding loving people where they are at and engaging in their culture and needs, then I didn&#8217;t want to do ministry.<br />
   Listen, I&#8217;m heading up the 1838 ministry at ACU next year, cause Mark Lewis asked me to and I&#8217;m also starting up this ministry called &#8220;Jesus &amp; The Hip-Hop Prophets&#8221; on campus. I was wondering if I could email you about some things and maybe get some insight from you concerning some stuff for the upcoming school year. I would really appreciate it.</p>
<p>Peace,</p>
<p>Matt W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12463</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 01:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12463</guid>
		<description>I began SBTS in Louisville 6 months before the SBC came down heavy on women in ministry and missions, and before they changed the fabulous ecumenical fabric of that great place of spiritual and theological learning. During the political turmoil, I noticed that many of the churches in the area which were staffed predominantly by seminary professors seemed to be dying in their communities. 

The church that I ended up interning at and becoming most involved with was Southeast Christian Church, where Bob Russell preaches. At the time SECC was experiencing absolutely phenomenal growth, and Bob and the elders couldn't understand why. They never planned for it to become a 'mega-church' (that phrase wasn't even coined yet). They just knew that they had seriously prayed for God to help them grow the church in the way He saw fit, and were overwhelmed with His answer. When I began serving there, I asked Bob if it was OK if I did not complete seminary. I was seeing then that although much of what I was learning was a true blessing to me, I was having concerns about becoming 'too professional' in my quest -- if I continued it seemed to pull me further and further away from people who would not be able to relate through the theological fog I so enjoy!  :) 

Bob had me look at the make-up of the staff at SECC. He pointed out that over half of the staff did not have a post-grad degree from a seminary. At the time he was not that familiar with ACU, my alma mater, but he knew that I had a strong Biblical and educational background. He and others there assured and encouraged me that God could use me in meaningful ministry without professional posturing (for lack of a better phrase). I had always felt somewhat inadequate in my training, as I had yearned all my life to become a minister. But the years I attended ACC/ACU were when women were not allowed to major in Bible. So I took as many missions courses (which seemed then to be treated like a Third World cousin) as I could. Academic confidence was not such a forte for me in those years, but I tried.

Anyway, all this to say, it's about time that we re-think things through with regards to professional studies in ministry, missions, theology, and application. IMHO, it's important not to throw the 'pro' out of the mission yet. Especially as more of Christian society seems to be falling into Biblical illiteracy. There is a lot of good to be said for ardent study, but we need to craft it around meaningful, missional ministry in post-modernity and beyond. Mentoring, dialoguing, and discipling are so needed. As are those who have God’s gifting in academics, analysis, and educating.

These are exciting times ... we are rethinking here in the UK, too! Thanks for this post, Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I began SBTS in Louisville 6 months before the SBC came down heavy on women in ministry and missions, and before they changed the fabulous ecumenical fabric of that great place of spiritual and theological learning. During the political turmoil, I noticed that many of the churches in the area which were staffed predominantly by seminary professors seemed to be dying in their communities. </p>
<p>The church that I ended up interning at and becoming most involved with was Southeast Christian Church, where Bob Russell preaches. At the time SECC was experiencing absolutely phenomenal growth, and Bob and the elders couldn&#8217;t understand why. They never planned for it to become a &#8216;mega-church&#8217; (that phrase wasn&#8217;t even coined yet). They just knew that they had seriously prayed for God to help them grow the church in the way He saw fit, and were overwhelmed with His answer. When I began serving there, I asked Bob if it was OK if I did not complete seminary. I was seeing then that although much of what I was learning was a true blessing to me, I was having concerns about becoming &#8216;too professional&#8217; in my quest &#8212; if I continued it seemed to pull me further and further away from people who would not be able to relate through the theological fog I so enjoy!  <img src='http://preachermike.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Bob had me look at the make-up of the staff at SECC. He pointed out that over half of the staff did not have a post-grad degree from a seminary. At the time he was not that familiar with ACU, my alma mater, but he knew that I had a strong Biblical and educational background. He and others there assured and encouraged me that God could use me in meaningful ministry without professional posturing (for lack of a better phrase). I had always felt somewhat inadequate in my training, as I had yearned all my life to become a minister. But the years I attended ACC/ACU were when women were not allowed to major in Bible. So I took as many missions courses (which seemed then to be treated like a Third World cousin) as I could. Academic confidence was not such a forte for me in those years, but I tried.</p>
<p>Anyway, all this to say, it&#8217;s about time that we re-think things through with regards to professional studies in ministry, missions, theology, and application. IMHO, it&#8217;s important not to throw the &#8216;pro&#8217; out of the mission yet. Especially as more of Christian society seems to be falling into Biblical illiteracy. There is a lot of good to be said for ardent study, but we need to craft it around meaningful, missional ministry in post-modernity and beyond. Mentoring, dialoguing, and discipling are so needed. As are those who have God’s gifting in academics, analysis, and educating.</p>
<p>These are exciting times &#8230; we are rethinking here in the UK, too! Thanks for this post, Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddy Gray</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12462</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 23:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12462</guid>
		<description>Mike,
Thanks for your thoughts today(and everyday) on the present and future church that we are serving.  The tension for forming relevant messages comes from good exegetical skills in two areas, the Bible and the population you are serving. Some populations need "professionals" so they can hear the word in a language they understand.  Other populations need someone educated but maybe not as polished so that socio-economic barriers are not an issue.  It takes all kinds to bring the word of God to everyone.  Great thought provoking post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
Thanks for your thoughts today(and everyday) on the present and future church that we are serving.  The tension for forming relevant messages comes from good exegetical skills in two areas, the Bible and the population you are serving. Some populations need &#8220;professionals&#8221; so they can hear the word in a language they understand.  Other populations need someone educated but maybe not as polished so that socio-economic barriers are not an issue.  It takes all kinds to bring the word of God to everyone.  Great thought provoking post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12460</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12460</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mike, for putting yourself out in the open to encourage and challenge us.  I was really spurred on by your post and most of the responses too.  I grew up in a wonderful church and was trained by great teachers and missionaries.  Still, it is hard to figure out how to do this right.  

God bless us as we take his love to the masses... whether in huge buildings or tiny homes.  

...oh yea, what do you think about them Mavs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike, for putting yourself out in the open to encourage and challenge us.  I was really spurred on by your post and most of the responses too.  I grew up in a wonderful church and was trained by great teachers and missionaries.  Still, it is hard to figure out how to do this right.  </p>
<p>God bless us as we take his love to the masses&#8230; whether in huge buildings or tiny homes.  </p>
<p>&#8230;oh yea, what do you think about them Mavs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12459</link>
		<dc:creator>don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12459</guid>
		<description>John, I will speak for myself, and not Mike, but to me it sounds like your question on the Memorial Day blog--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Hi Mike:

Could you please explain what it means when you wrote “And I double my prayers for the kingdom of God to continue breaking in”? I’ve seen you refer to this event before, but I have no idea what you mean. I thought the kingdom was here.

All the best,

John"
---------------------------------------------------------------------

is asking about the kingdom and its status as here, not here, already, not yet.  

"The kingdom" is spoken of many times, and means at least three different things that I can think of in the NT.  Jesus speaks of the kingdom in parables which seem to mean the eternal kingdom, and the kingdom as the church here in the present.  In addition, the kingdom can refer to the belief that there will be an actual physical millenial kingdom on earth ruled over by Jesus with a "rod of iron". 

Also, if you spoke to an Israelite during the time of Jesus, it would have meant to him the kingdom of David, which had been taken away, and for which they were looking for a return, based on their understanding of prophetic language they were familiar with.  

This term can mean many things, and I feel Mike is using it to mean the breaking in of Christ's reign (not the millenial reign, but the "thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven" reign during this church age we are in. Some would equate this phrase with the millenial reign, but I don't believe he is using it that way).  But before I continue to try to explain what I think he means, I'd better stop, because I may be way off.  

The way I have heard this phrase used --already but not yet--I feel the speaker is trying to say that we are agents for the "inbreaking" of his leadership and influence in the here and now, and "the kingdom" is being used in a way to refer to the church as well as its influence; to God's called out people here on earth. I also infer an active role for the Holy Spirit in this inbreaking.

Maybe this will get the discussion going for you.  I hope this is what you are asking, and offer it in a spirit of trying to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I will speak for myself, and not Mike, but to me it sounds like your question on the Memorial Day blog&#8211;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
&#8220;Hi Mike:</p>
<p>Could you please explain what it means when you wrote “And I double my prayers for the kingdom of God to continue breaking in”? I’ve seen you refer to this event before, but I have no idea what you mean. I thought the kingdom was here.</p>
<p>All the best,</p>
<p>John&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>is asking about the kingdom and its status as here, not here, already, not yet.  </p>
<p>&#8220;The kingdom&#8221; is spoken of many times, and means at least three different things that I can think of in the NT.  Jesus speaks of the kingdom in parables which seem to mean the eternal kingdom, and the kingdom as the church here in the present.  In addition, the kingdom can refer to the belief that there will be an actual physical millenial kingdom on earth ruled over by Jesus with a &#8220;rod of iron&#8221;. </p>
<p>Also, if you spoke to an Israelite during the time of Jesus, it would have meant to him the kingdom of David, which had been taken away, and for which they were looking for a return, based on their understanding of prophetic language they were familiar with.  </p>
<p>This term can mean many things, and I feel Mike is using it to mean the breaking in of Christ&#8217;s reign (not the millenial reign, but the &#8220;thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven&#8221; reign during this church age we are in. Some would equate this phrase with the millenial reign, but I don&#8217;t believe he is using it that way).  But before I continue to try to explain what I think he means, I&#8217;d better stop, because I may be way off.  </p>
<p>The way I have heard this phrase used &#8211;already but not yet&#8211;I feel the speaker is trying to say that we are agents for the &#8220;inbreaking&#8221; of his leadership and influence in the here and now, and &#8220;the kingdom&#8221; is being used in a way to refer to the church as well as its influence; to God&#8217;s called out people here on earth. I also infer an active role for the Holy Spirit in this inbreaking.</p>
<p>Maybe this will get the discussion going for you.  I hope this is what you are asking, and offer it in a spirit of trying to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12458</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12458</guid>
		<description>You get it Mike. Like very few others at your level of 'professional' experience and success. Your words, depth and maturity give me hope for the future of the CofC heritage. Bless you and yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You get it Mike. Like very few others at your level of &#8216;professional&#8217; experience and success. Your words, depth and maturity give me hope for the future of the CofC heritage. Bless you and yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12457</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12457</guid>
		<description>"After all a professional minister is getting paid for his skills of teaching, organizing and preaching within the church."  

Mike -I'm curious...  

What is our New Testament model for having paid preachers in the first place? 

Also, why are you committed to helping a large church when you say the future is in the small church.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;After all a professional minister is getting paid for his skills of teaching, organizing and preaching within the church.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Mike -I&#8217;m curious&#8230;  </p>
<p>What is our New Testament model for having paid preachers in the first place? </p>
<p>Also, why are you committed to helping a large church when you say the future is in the small church.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12453</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12453</guid>
		<description>Mike wrote, "John - I don’t need the reminder. When I can get to it, I will. Thanks. "

Whether intentional or not, your words are harsh. 

I am a seeker, and I thought you were a teacher. You may not remember, but a year or more ago (it may have been two) I asked ths same question of you when you wrote about the "Kingdom breaking in" and you promised to write about it soon. As such, it would seem to me that you do need the reminder.

You made a promise that many months later you still have not kept. I would think that someone with "With seven years of Greek and a couple years of Hebrew along with class after class of textual studies" would not have a problem dealing with something that they clearly believe in. I have no such education, so I turn to you for help.

I am sorry if I seem harsh.

All the best of the day!

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike wrote, &#8220;John - I don’t need the reminder. When I can get to it, I will. Thanks. &#8221;</p>
<p>Whether intentional or not, your words are harsh. </p>
<p>I am a seeker, and I thought you were a teacher. You may not remember, but a year or more ago (it may have been two) I asked ths same question of you when you wrote about the &#8220;Kingdom breaking in&#8221; and you promised to write about it soon. As such, it would seem to me that you do need the reminder.</p>
<p>You made a promise that many months later you still have not kept. I would think that someone with &#8220;With seven years of Greek and a couple years of Hebrew along with class after class of textual studies&#8221; would not have a problem dealing with something that they clearly believe in. I have no such education, so I turn to you for help.</p>
<p>I am sorry if I seem harsh.</p>
<p>All the best of the day!</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qb</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12452</link>
		<dc:creator>qb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12452</guid>
		<description>Big Mike's rhetorical question about "a different kind of sermon" rings truly with me.  I'm not really sure that when Jesus sat down and started to teach on the hillside, he prefaced his remarks by saying, "the sermon starts here; I'll let you know when I'm done."  The sermons of Acts 17, Acts 2, Acts 8 and elsewhere just aren't that awfully long, and they seem to fit more squarely into a model-less model, a context that Willard seems to hint at with his renaming of the "discourse on the hill."  They were ad-hoc remarks that jump-started a dialogue, in other words, instead of standing on their own as one-way sermons.  The one-way sermon model seems to lend itself to perpetuating and being perpetuated by the anthropocentrism, preachercentrism, "you da man" culture that pervades the contemporary church across all denominational strata.

The passage that lurks in the back of my mind here is I Corinthians 14, in which Paul makes it pretty plain that he wishes all of the church "members" or "body parts" would prophesy.  Similarly to Moses (Numbers 11?), Paul was not interested, apparently, in being considered the ultimate prophetic authority within a group of Christians.  He wanted that gift to be dispersed among all who aspired to it, had been gifted by the Holy Spirit "just as he wills" and had the humble temperament required to exercise it faithfully.

I surely would be interested in some ruminations on this concept, because it is slowly becoming an obsession with me.

qb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Mike&#8217;s rhetorical question about &#8220;a different kind of sermon&#8221; rings truly with me.  I&#8217;m not really sure that when Jesus sat down and started to teach on the hillside, he prefaced his remarks by saying, &#8220;the sermon starts here; I&#8217;ll let you know when I&#8217;m done.&#8221;  The sermons of Acts 17, Acts 2, Acts 8 and elsewhere just aren&#8217;t that awfully long, and they seem to fit more squarely into a model-less model, a context that Willard seems to hint at with his renaming of the &#8220;discourse on the hill.&#8221;  They were ad-hoc remarks that jump-started a dialogue, in other words, instead of standing on their own as one-way sermons.  The one-way sermon model seems to lend itself to perpetuating and being perpetuated by the anthropocentrism, preachercentrism, &#8220;you da man&#8221; culture that pervades the contemporary church across all denominational strata.</p>
<p>The passage that lurks in the back of my mind here is I Corinthians 14, in which Paul makes it pretty plain that he wishes all of the church &#8220;members&#8221; or &#8220;body parts&#8221; would prophesy.  Similarly to Moses (Numbers 11?), Paul was not interested, apparently, in being considered the ultimate prophetic authority within a group of Christians.  He wanted that gift to be dispersed among all who aspired to it, had been gifted by the Holy Spirit &#8220;just as he wills&#8221; and had the humble temperament required to exercise it faithfully.</p>
<p>I surely would be interested in some ruminations on this concept, because it is slowly becoming an obsession with me.</p>
<p>qb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12451</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/06/14/training-for-professionalism#comment-12451</guid>
		<description>Sorry to make a second comment on the same thread, but...

When I told my elders that I spend an hour in study for each minute in the pulpit, they voted to cut my hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to make a second comment on the same thread, but&#8230;</p>
<p>When I told my elders that I spend an hour in study for each minute in the pulpit, they voted to cut my hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.850 seconds -->
