<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memorial Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day</link>
	<description>Sniffing out the work of God in the world...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack Jackson</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-41387</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-41387</guid>
		<description>Google is the best search engine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is the best search engine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G'ampa C</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12328</link>
		<dc:creator>G'ampa C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 03:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12328</guid>
		<description>John-
I think the kingdom exists now in all who allow him to be lord ("the kingdom is within you...").  Those who will make that commitment 50 or 100 or 1000 years from now (if the world lasts that long) will be added to his kingdom.  You seem to be wanting it to be an organized thing like a country, but I don't see it that way.  I see it as a personal lordship in each of us which is added to the host of all who have made him their king.  At the end of time, all those who ever will become his subjects will be gathered, so it will be fully come.  Then all things will be subject to him, and he will bring us to the Father.  At the final judgement, every knee shall bow to him, and every tongue confess he is Lord of all, because at the Judgement, there will be only truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John-<br />
I think the kingdom exists now in all who allow him to be lord (&#8221;the kingdom is within you&#8230;&#8221;).  Those who will make that commitment 50 or 100 or 1000 years from now (if the world lasts that long) will be added to his kingdom.  You seem to be wanting it to be an organized thing like a country, but I don&#8217;t see it that way.  I see it as a personal lordship in each of us which is added to the host of all who have made him their king.  At the end of time, all those who ever will become his subjects will be gathered, so it will be fully come.  Then all things will be subject to him, and he will bring us to the Father.  At the final judgement, every knee shall bow to him, and every tongue confess he is Lord of all, because at the Judgement, there will be only truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12323</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12323</guid>
		<description>Hi Gampa'C:

Quoting from your earlier writing, "I don’t believe his kingdom will be fully come until the end of time, when his will is always done, everywhere.”  

Is what you are saying that there cannot be a kingdom until all who will be born into that kingdom have been born into it? 

When the Lord returns, He will hand the Kingdom back to God the Father. As such, it will no longer be His. Is this not correct? Do you accept that Jesus has authority over all mankind, whether they accept that authority or not?

Thanks for studying with me!

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gampa&#8217;C:</p>
<p>Quoting from your earlier writing, &#8220;I don’t believe his kingdom will be fully come until the end of time, when his will is always done, everywhere.”  </p>
<p>Is what you are saying that there cannot be a kingdom until all who will be born into that kingdom have been born into it? </p>
<p>When the Lord returns, He will hand the Kingdom back to God the Father. As such, it will no longer be His. Is this not correct? Do you accept that Jesus has authority over all mankind, whether they accept that authority or not?</p>
<p>Thanks for studying with me!</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G'ampa C</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12307</link>
		<dc:creator>G'ampa C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12307</guid>
		<description>John-
I believe the text you quoted to be consistent with the Kingdom past, present and future.  The place where the kingdom lies is our hearts, our souls, every bit of us when we have turned it over to him.  Will he raise some organized religion when he makes us alive at the end, or will he raise us?  It is us, because that is where his kingdom exists, not a kingdom of this world.  If he has not returned, say, by the year 2100, will people still be making him their king?  I hope so.  But that will mean some of his kingdom is still to come.  He is my king, so I am part of his kingdom now.  When the day comes where he raises all who have died, but who have appointed him in their hearts as king, then he will present us to his Father.  What a day that will be.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John-<br />
I believe the text you quoted to be consistent with the Kingdom past, present and future.  The place where the kingdom lies is our hearts, our souls, every bit of us when we have turned it over to him.  Will he raise some organized religion when he makes us alive at the end, or will he raise us?  It is us, because that is where his kingdom exists, not a kingdom of this world.  If he has not returned, say, by the year 2100, will people still be making him their king?  I hope so.  But that will mean some of his kingdom is still to come.  He is my king, so I am part of his kingdom now.  When the day comes where he raises all who have died, but who have appointed him in their hearts as king, then he will present us to his Father.  What a day that will be&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12261</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12261</guid>
		<description>G'ampa C, 

First, thanks very much for responding. You wrote,

"A kingdom is a place with an accepted ruler, so it is also right to say “His kingdom is in me.”, or “His kingdom is coming.” I don’t believe his kingdom will be fully come until the end of time, when his will is always done, everywhere."

How do you come to this conclusion in light of 1 Cor. 15:20-26? In the end, that is when Christ returns, He will return the Kingdom to the Father. Christ's reign is now, not in the future.

I appreciate your thoughts on this, and I would love to have Mike wade in. Are you home yet?

1 Cor. 15:20-26

"But now Christ is risen from the dead, and has become the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. For since by man came death, by Man also came the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive. But each one in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who are Christ's at His coming. Then comes the end , when He delivers the kingdom to God the Father, when He puts an end to all rule and all authority and power. For He must reign till He has put all enemies under His feet. The last enemy that will be destroyed is death."


Thanks for your time!

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#8217;ampa C, </p>
<p>First, thanks very much for responding. You wrote,</p>
<p>&#8220;A kingdom is a place with an accepted ruler, so it is also right to say “His kingdom is in me.”, or “His kingdom is coming.” I don’t believe his kingdom will be fully come until the end of time, when his will is always done, everywhere.&#8221;</p>
<p>How do you come to this conclusion in light of 1 Cor. 15:20-26? In the end, that is when Christ returns, He will return the Kingdom to the Father. Christ&#8217;s reign is now, not in the future.</p>
<p>I appreciate your thoughts on this, and I would love to have Mike wade in. Are you home yet?</p>
<p>1 Cor. 15:20-26</p>
<p>&#8220;But now Christ is risen from the dead, and has become the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. For since by man came death, by Man also came the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive. But each one in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who are Christ&#8217;s at His coming. Then comes the end , when He delivers the kingdom to God the Father, when He puts an end to all rule and all authority and power. For He must reign till He has put all enemies under His feet. The last enemy that will be destroyed is death.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for your time!</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G'ampa C</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12195</link>
		<dc:creator>G'ampa C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 02:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12195</guid>
		<description>To John-
Mike is at the Zoe conference in Colorado. Having heard him speak about this from the pulpit may times, perhaps I can give you part of an answer.  I don't presume to put words in Mike's mouth (and he can disclaim any knowledge of this incident).  Maybe what Mike means is that, in the "Lord's Prayer", Jesus said "Your kingdom come, your will be done on earth, as it is in heaven."  There is an indication that things on earth did not and do not  follow God's will in every sense.  Carry that a step further and think about the Kingdom.  Jesus said the Kingdom was "among you", and his kingdom was "not of this world" then the Kingdom came with power in Acts 2.  The kingdom came in my life on December 1, 1969, when I committed myself to Jesus.  There are many, many souls for which the kingdom has not yet come, because thay have not  experienced it and know nothing about it.  I think of it like the electricity industry.   It exists (for over 100 years now), it has revolutionized everything it touched, but there are many places in the world where it is not present.
A kingdom is a place with an accepted ruler, so it  is also right to say "His kingdom is in me.", or  "His kingdom is coming."   I don't believe his kingdom will be fully come until the end of time, when his will is always done, everywhere.
Mike speaks of the kingdom "breaking out" and "breaking forth" and "breaking in" as new people submit to his kingship, and God works in people's lives.  Sometimes that happens through institutional church and sometimes it happens in other ways.
Becoming a citizen of the kingdom means this world is no longer my real home, and I am no longer the boss.  I have become a laborer and alien.
Has the kingdom come?  Yes.
Is the kingdom coming now?  Yes.
Will it be coming in the future?  Yes.   (How about that---intro to conjugation!)
Matthew is rich with kingdom narratives, and I think this post seems to fit with all those narratives, but Mike may chime in when he gets back and disavow any knowledge of my actions....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To John-<br />
Mike is at the Zoe conference in Colorado. Having heard him speak about this from the pulpit may times, perhaps I can give you part of an answer.  I don&#8217;t presume to put words in Mike&#8217;s mouth (and he can disclaim any knowledge of this incident).  Maybe what Mike means is that, in the &#8220;Lord&#8217;s Prayer&#8221;, Jesus said &#8220;Your kingdom come, your will be done on earth, as it is in heaven.&#8221;  There is an indication that things on earth did not and do not  follow God&#8217;s will in every sense.  Carry that a step further and think about the Kingdom.  Jesus said the Kingdom was &#8220;among you&#8221;, and his kingdom was &#8220;not of this world&#8221; then the Kingdom came with power in Acts 2.  The kingdom came in my life on December 1, 1969, when I committed myself to Jesus.  There are many, many souls for which the kingdom has not yet come, because thay have not  experienced it and know nothing about it.  I think of it like the electricity industry.   It exists (for over 100 years now), it has revolutionized everything it touched, but there are many places in the world where it is not present.<br />
A kingdom is a place with an accepted ruler, so it  is also right to say &#8220;His kingdom is in me.&#8221;, or  &#8220;His kingdom is coming.&#8221;   I don&#8217;t believe his kingdom will be fully come until the end of time, when his will is always done, everywhere.<br />
Mike speaks of the kingdom &#8220;breaking out&#8221; and &#8220;breaking forth&#8221; and &#8220;breaking in&#8221; as new people submit to his kingship, and God works in people&#8217;s lives.  Sometimes that happens through institutional church and sometimes it happens in other ways.<br />
Becoming a citizen of the kingdom means this world is no longer my real home, and I am no longer the boss.  I have become a laborer and alien.<br />
Has the kingdom come?  Yes.<br />
Is the kingdom coming now?  Yes.<br />
Will it be coming in the future?  Yes.   (How about that&#8212;intro to conjugation!)<br />
Matthew is rich with kingdom narratives, and I think this post seems to fit with all those narratives, but Mike may chime in when he gets back and disavow any knowledge of my actions&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12150</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 12:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12150</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike:

I know you're busy, but I want to remind you of my earlier entry and question:

Hello again Mike,

When you wrote, “The rule of God has, indeed, broken in — again and again, but especially through the ministry of Jesus. But it has not become fully realized on earth as it is in heaven,” what scripture were you thinking of to corroborate it?

Colossians 1:13 says, “For he has rescued us out of the darkness and gloom of Satan’s kingdom and brought us into the Kingdom of his dear Son.” TLB

Is Paul not saying the Kingdom was currently present? I cannot find any passages that talk about the Kingdom coming in gradually. I would appreciate very much you pointing them out to me.

Thanks for your help!

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike:</p>
<p>I know you&#8217;re busy, but I want to remind you of my earlier entry and question:</p>
<p>Hello again Mike,</p>
<p>When you wrote, “The rule of God has, indeed, broken in — again and again, but especially through the ministry of Jesus. But it has not become fully realized on earth as it is in heaven,” what scripture were you thinking of to corroborate it?</p>
<p>Colossians 1:13 says, “For he has rescued us out of the darkness and gloom of Satan’s kingdom and brought us into the Kingdom of his dear Son.” TLB</p>
<p>Is Paul not saying the Kingdom was currently present? I cannot find any passages that talk about the Kingdom coming in gradually. I would appreciate very much you pointing them out to me.</p>
<p>Thanks for your help!</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Summers</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12146</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12146</guid>
		<description>Mike,
I just noticed that the link to my website is wrong.  This has not always been the case and I don't know when it happened.  My site is www.michaelwaymonsummers.blogspot.com, not blogsite.com.  By the way, I really appreciate the fellowship provided by your site. 
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
I just noticed that the link to my website is wrong.  This has not always been the case and I don&#8217;t know when it happened.  My site is <a href="http://www.michaelwaymonsummers.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.michaelwaymonsummers.blogspot.com</a>, not blogsite.com.  By the way, I really appreciate the fellowship provided by your site.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Summers</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12145</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12145</guid>
		<description>Brett,
Chaplains do sometimes go on patrol; they go where soldiers are.  Wisdom sometimes dictates where they go, but several chaplains have been awarded the Medal of Honor for pulling and carrying several wounded soldiers to safety under heavy enemy fire.  Some of them were killed while saving the others.  Chaplains also teach (about suicide prevention, sexual harassment prevention), counsel, advise commanders (on ethics, morals, indigenous religious customs, etc.), and preach what they believe.  As was General George Washington's intent, chaplains also often have a calming affect on soldiers merely by their presence, even on their choice of vocabulary.  Some chaplains work primarily in hospitals, others serve in support units, some jump out of  perfectly good airplanes, but mostly they try to put in a good word for God. 
It's hard to avoid conflict of interest.  Paying taxes, for example, funds our military.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett,<br />
Chaplains do sometimes go on patrol; they go where soldiers are.  Wisdom sometimes dictates where they go, but several chaplains have been awarded the Medal of Honor for pulling and carrying several wounded soldiers to safety under heavy enemy fire.  Some of them were killed while saving the others.  Chaplains also teach (about suicide prevention, sexual harassment prevention), counsel, advise commanders (on ethics, morals, indigenous religious customs, etc.), and preach what they believe.  As was General George Washington&#8217;s intent, chaplains also often have a calming affect on soldiers merely by their presence, even on their choice of vocabulary.  Some chaplains work primarily in hospitals, others serve in support units, some jump out of  perfectly good airplanes, but mostly they try to put in a good word for God.<br />
It&#8217;s hard to avoid conflict of interest.  Paying taxes, for example, funds our military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BW</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12144</link>
		<dc:creator>BW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 22:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12144</guid>
		<description>For some reason this comment keeps getting caught in moderation filter. Maybe this try will make it. Here's what I wrote on Memorial Day:

Thank you, Mike, for your thoughtful post this Memorial Day. 

You are correct, IMO, when you observe that regardless of what a person thinks about war related issues that “we have all benefitted from the courage and sacrifice of those who have fought for freedom.” 

I distinctly remember attending only a few funerals, as a young person. The most vivid memories are of attending the funeral service of my eighteen year old cousin, Gail Lynn Strickland, in Amarillo, Texas. He was killed on August 12, 1971. His helicopter was shot down in Vietnam. 

Each year, when Memorial Day rolls around, I am transported back to the day of his memorial service. His immediate family members were so devastated. I was weeks away from turning thirteen and swimming in a sea of conflicting emotions. I remember sitting through the service with my cousin staring at me from the framed, glossy photograph, which was displayed on a table next to his flag-draped casket.

A few years ago, I found his name engraved in the Vietnam Memorial Wall in Washington, D.C. I was not prepared for the emotional impact of this moment. Not just because I found his name, but because I found his name amidst so many others—more that 58,000 other names. 

So, as we remember those who have given life and limb for our freedom, let us remember that each one was someone’s daughter, son, brother, sister, husband, wife, cousin or friend. Let us remember, also, there is no greater love than to lay down one’s life for his friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason this comment keeps getting caught in moderation filter. Maybe this try will make it. Here&#8217;s what I wrote on Memorial Day:</p>
<p>Thank you, Mike, for your thoughtful post this Memorial Day. </p>
<p>You are correct, IMO, when you observe that regardless of what a person thinks about war related issues that “we have all benefitted from the courage and sacrifice of those who have fought for freedom.” </p>
<p>I distinctly remember attending only a few funerals, as a young person. The most vivid memories are of attending the funeral service of my eighteen year old cousin, Gail Lynn Strickland, in Amarillo, Texas. He was killed on August 12, 1971. His helicopter was shot down in Vietnam. </p>
<p>Each year, when Memorial Day rolls around, I am transported back to the day of his memorial service. His immediate family members were so devastated. I was weeks away from turning thirteen and swimming in a sea of conflicting emotions. I remember sitting through the service with my cousin staring at me from the framed, glossy photograph, which was displayed on a table next to his flag-draped casket.</p>
<p>A few years ago, I found his name engraved in the Vietnam Memorial Wall in Washington, D.C. I was not prepared for the emotional impact of this moment. Not just because I found his name, but because I found his name amidst so many others—more that 58,000 other names. </p>
<p>So, as we remember those who have given life and limb for our freedom, let us remember that each one was someone’s daughter, son, brother, sister, husband, wife, cousin or friend. Let us remember, also, there is no greater love than to lay down one’s life for his friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12135</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 03:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12135</guid>
		<description>As a veteran of the Vietnam War I pray that my young grandson will never have to face the horrors of war.  Especially unnecessary wars of choice, chosen by men who avoided war themselves when their country called them. 

I honor those who have fallen. I was one who got to come home when it was over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a veteran of the Vietnam War I pray that my young grandson will never have to face the horrors of war.  Especially unnecessary wars of choice, chosen by men who avoided war themselves when their country called them. </p>
<p>I honor those who have fallen. I was one who got to come home when it was over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G'ampa C</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12129</link>
		<dc:creator>G'ampa C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 00:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12129</guid>
		<description>I have friends who are vets and family members who are vets.  War is not good and has not been good for any of them.  After reading the discussion about what Jesus would do and not do, and what is right and wrong,I would have to say there should be some things upon which we can agree:

1. We should pray for our military.  No matter what you think about the war, they deserve that.  We should pray for their souls and their health and their families.  That they come home safe and safely.

2. We should pray for our enemies.  Not that they would have a nice day or have good aim or  be successful in their missions, but that they would learn of Jesus and be saved by his grace.  By some mysterious turn of that grace, I was born into a family which believed in Jesus and I learned about him there.  For that I am eternally grateful and I thank the Lord for it.  Others have not been so blessed.  I am convinced that when our enemies are saved by Jesus, the war will be over.  Is that worth praying for?

3. We should pray for our leaders and the leaders of all nations and even terrorist organizations, that they would be led by God's will and become servants of Jesus.  It is terrible and frightening that our soldiers and those of our enemies may be going to judgement without the grace of Jesus.  As Christians, if either one of those events is OK, there is something really, really wrong.  There is no place for hatred in Jesus.

4. We should pray for ourselves that we would learn to love all men, including our enemies, that we would be instruments for peace in God's hands.  We, who may not risk our lives in battle, should be sensitive to those who do. We should be careful that our words, regardless of the good or bad politics, will not wound those who are serving in our military, nor wound their families who miss them and love them and worry that they will never come back.  What would Jesus do?  He would love everyone, including our enemies, enough that he would want them in heaven with him.  He would be sensitive to those who are hurting.  He would care, really care, about the lost.  What would the world of Islam think if we prayed for their souls in the same breath with prayers for our soldiers every day?  What would the Lord God of the universe think about that, and what might he do with that?
I don't mean to bring offense, but I really hope these are things upon which we can agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have friends who are vets and family members who are vets.  War is not good and has not been good for any of them.  After reading the discussion about what Jesus would do and not do, and what is right and wrong,I would have to say there should be some things upon which we can agree:</p>
<p>1. We should pray for our military.  No matter what you think about the war, they deserve that.  We should pray for their souls and their health and their families.  That they come home safe and safely.</p>
<p>2. We should pray for our enemies.  Not that they would have a nice day or have good aim or  be successful in their missions, but that they would learn of Jesus and be saved by his grace.  By some mysterious turn of that grace, I was born into a family which believed in Jesus and I learned about him there.  For that I am eternally grateful and I thank the Lord for it.  Others have not been so blessed.  I am convinced that when our enemies are saved by Jesus, the war will be over.  Is that worth praying for?</p>
<p>3. We should pray for our leaders and the leaders of all nations and even terrorist organizations, that they would be led by God&#8217;s will and become servants of Jesus.  It is terrible and frightening that our soldiers and those of our enemies may be going to judgement without the grace of Jesus.  As Christians, if either one of those events is OK, there is something really, really wrong.  There is no place for hatred in Jesus.</p>
<p>4. We should pray for ourselves that we would learn to love all men, including our enemies, that we would be instruments for peace in God&#8217;s hands.  We, who may not risk our lives in battle, should be sensitive to those who do. We should be careful that our words, regardless of the good or bad politics, will not wound those who are serving in our military, nor wound their families who miss them and love them and worry that they will never come back.  What would Jesus do?  He would love everyone, including our enemies, enough that he would want them in heaven with him.  He would be sensitive to those who are hurting.  He would care, really care, about the lost.  What would the world of Islam think if we prayed for their souls in the same breath with prayers for our soldiers every day?  What would the Lord God of the universe think about that, and what might he do with that?<br />
I don&#8217;t mean to bring offense, but I really hope these are things upon which we can agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Keller</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12128</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 23:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12128</guid>
		<description>That's interesting Michael. I always assumed the role of a chaplain was similar to a medic- carriyng a weapon but ready to take care of the wounded (of course, not having been in the army, that's an assumption too). If you're not carrying a weapon, what exactly do you do? Do you 'minister' full time, and if so, would you go into active combat, or on 'patrol'?

If one believes killing another human is immoral though, supporting those who do it would be like acting as an accomplice to an immoral act. Another example- I do physics research for NASA through Harding, developing spectrometers as sensors to make hybrid rocket motors more efficient. I've thought this through, and I don't believe the technology I'm developing has a serious military use- like cruise missiles or ICBMs- so I don't have moral qualms with it.  I would however have a problem developing technology that would be used in a nuclear warhead or other weapons that necessitate civilians casualties in their usage. I have an engineer friend who just graduated, who is interested in working on aerospace technology, including nukes, based on the logic that "if our country does it, it must be necessary, and therefore moral." I find that opinion naive and rather frightening...

Through that sort of logic, a lot of people who are conscientious objectors to bearing arms would likewise object to playing a support role to the military.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting Michael. I always assumed the role of a chaplain was similar to a medic- carriyng a weapon but ready to take care of the wounded (of course, not having been in the army, that&#8217;s an assumption too). If you&#8217;re not carrying a weapon, what exactly do you do? Do you &#8216;minister&#8217; full time, and if so, would you go into active combat, or on &#8216;patrol&#8217;?</p>
<p>If one believes killing another human is immoral though, supporting those who do it would be like acting as an accomplice to an immoral act. Another example- I do physics research for NASA through Harding, developing spectrometers as sensors to make hybrid rocket motors more efficient. I&#8217;ve thought this through, and I don&#8217;t believe the technology I&#8217;m developing has a serious military use- like cruise missiles or ICBMs- so I don&#8217;t have moral qualms with it.  I would however have a problem developing technology that would be used in a nuclear warhead or other weapons that necessitate civilians casualties in their usage. I have an engineer friend who just graduated, who is interested in working on aerospace technology, including nukes, based on the logic that &#8220;if our country does it, it must be necessary, and therefore moral.&#8221; I find that opinion naive and rather frightening&#8230;</p>
<p>Through that sort of logic, a lot of people who are conscientious objectors to bearing arms would likewise object to playing a support role to the military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Summers</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12127</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 22:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12127</guid>
		<description>Brett, Bob, and J. Pierpont (et al. if I've missed any),
Great comments.  We need continued thoughtful discussion on this topic.  I firmly believe that as Christians, we should "seek peace, and pursue it." Another note: our Army does not permit its chaplains to carry weapons.  It makes that job more dangerous, and requires others to defend the chaplain, but allows some who will not bear arms to engage in ministry to young men and women who are under tremendous stress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett, Bob, and J. Pierpont (et al. if I&#8217;ve missed any),<br />
Great comments.  We need continued thoughtful discussion on this topic.  I firmly believe that as Christians, we should &#8220;seek peace, and pursue it.&#8221; Another note: our Army does not permit its chaplains to carry weapons.  It makes that job more dangerous, and requires others to defend the chaplain, but allows some who will not bear arms to engage in ministry to young men and women who are under tremendous stress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12103</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 12:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preachermike.com/2006/05/29/memorial-day#comment-12103</guid>
		<description>Good Morning Scott:

I also appreciate our discussion, and like you, I look forward to Mike's comments on the subject.

I pray that your day will be blessed also!

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning Scott:</p>
<p>I also appreciate our discussion, and like you, I look forward to Mike&#8217;s comments on the subject.</p>
<p>I pray that your day will be blessed also!</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.553 seconds -->
